Crazy crazy crazy


If we ever get through all this craziness and Axpona kicks back up meet me on the second floor at the bar. I’m buying the first round. Stay safe friends.
arch2
Was talking the other day with a seemingly sensible person about coming over to hear my system when out of the blue he asked if I was vaccinated.

As my wife said, "If he is then why does he care if you are?"

But we cannot go there without falling spinning and reeling into the pretzel logic of the indoctrinated.

"I see dead people."

Brilliant.
Those interested in finding their way out of the madness into the light of day could do worse than check out the links mahgister provided above.
MC - not holding my breath, but care to surprise us with any comment on your proclivity for inaccurate representation of Australian health officials?
http://www.seekfind.net/Logical_Fallacy_of_Innuendo.html

The logical fallacy of innuendo, or implication, occurs when a conclusion is suggested to be true without directly stating the point. This is a fallacy because it is a deceptive tactic. Innuendo is generally used as a substitute for evidence. In other words, the innuendo technique is used as the only proof for a claim. It is often more persuasive than a straightforward statement because a clear statement is easier to evaluate for logical fallacies, to realize that a claim (implied) has no basis, no proof. Note that this is different from simply being unclear. What makes this a fallacy is that there is no evidence and the use of innuendo is a mechanism to hide the fact that there is no real evidence.