Harbeth hl5 vs Dali Euphonia SM4


I would love to hear some comments and opinions regarding the Harbeth Hl5 speaker vs the Dali Euphonia SM4. I play mostly electronic music at low volumes (rock (no metal)fusion, blues)
What I am looking for is definition. I want to hear each individual instrument not just a wall of music. For instance is there is a trio playing for example, Jack Bruce Robin Trower and Gary Husband trio or Jeff Beck live at Ronnie Scotts, I would like to hear each instrument seperately. This is especially true with the electric bass. I currently have a pair of Harbeth P3esr and a rel sub in a secondary system and previously had a pair of Sonus Faber Cremona Auditors with my main system. I will be powering the speakers with a pair of Pathos Classic I's that I have bridged, so about 140 watts per channel.
Thanks for any help.
gztone
Interesting post to me because I used to own SHL5s and sold them because I found them to lack enough definition, and I also have the Sonus Faber Cremona Auditors and find these to have significantly more definition and insight into the music and enjoy them more than the SHL5s. The Auditors are clearer with no feeling that musical details are hidden, an impression I had with the SHL5s.
(I now use and love the little-known Lahave Mela monitors which are much more satisfying and live-but-musical-and-compelling to me than either. The Melas are close to the Holy Grail for monitors to my ears..)
Rgs92 thanks for your input. Every thing I read seems to mirror your take on the SHL5's.
What I am looking for is definition.For instance is there is a trio playing for example, Jack Bruce Robin Trower and Gary Husband trio or Jeff Beck live at Ronnie Scotts, I would like to hear each instrument seperately. This is especially true with the electric bass.

definition depends on amps,cd player,dac interconnects.As for power.For example I am using krell kav500i for several days.I really enjoying slam and punch on Harbeth SHL5..great speakers capable of differentianting bass and tones of instrumments

05-03-12: Rgs92
Interesting post to me because I used to own SHL5s and sold them because I found them to lack enough definition, and I also have the Sonus Faber Cremona Auditors and find these to have significantly more definition and insight into the music and enjoy them more than the SHL5s. The Auditors are clearer with no feeling that musical details are hidden, an impression I had with the SHL5s.

Interesting observation as my experience and that of a close buddy of mine are on the contrary. I feel the Sonus Faber Cremona line and the lower models are colored and have less detail and resolution than the Harbeth SHL5. A friend who owns the M40.1 also felt the same way and for that reason the Cremonas were sold to make way for the 40.1. He used ARC Ref3/VT100 and tried various amps with the Cremonas when he had them but failed to make the speakers work in his system.

Similarly I owned the Grand Piano Concerto for 3 years and found them to severely lack definition and detail with rolled off highs. The overall sound is thick and shut-in. The Harbeth SHL5 are smooth speakers but sound more open in the midrange and airier in the highs with higher levels of resolution and detail.

Not too sure if the Cremona Auditor is different from the Cremona floorstanders though.
"Similarly I owned the Grand Piano Concerto for 3 years and found them to severely lack definition and detail with rolled off highs. The overall sound is thick and shut-in."

And you kept them for three years? Seriously?

Shakey