The sample rate is just how many times per second an electrical measurement is taken. It is expressed in HZ (cycles per second). 44.1 kHz was chosen for the CD Redbook standard because it enables full encoding for a 22 kHz musical waveform. This is at or beyond human hearing. Higher sample rates are only good for bats and dolphins!
16 bit vs 24 bit vs 35 bit vs 36 bit vs 64 bit DAC sampling
I have limited knowledge about DAC's, but as I understand it, a typical CD player used to have 16 bit sampling, and supposedly no one was supposed to be able to hear the difference between anything more than 16 bit sampling; however, I recently purchased an Esoteric K-01X, which has 35 bit sampling (why 35 bits? no doubt only to differentiate it from their then top of the line 36 bit sampled Grandioso series).
Now I can hear a big difference between my old Musical Fidelity kW DM25 DAC with 24 bit sampling (circa 2005), and the newer Esoteric DAC with 35 bit sampling, although I'm not supposed to, although maybe there are some other electrical programs playing with the sound besides the sampling rate.
Now, there are 64 bit sampling DAC's, and I'm wondering how much the ear actually does hear from the sampling, or if it's something else entirely that's making the digital sound better?
Any insightful opinions or perspectives?
Thanks.
Now I can hear a big difference between my old Musical Fidelity kW DM25 DAC with 24 bit sampling (circa 2005), and the newer Esoteric DAC with 35 bit sampling, although I'm not supposed to, although maybe there are some other electrical programs playing with the sound besides the sampling rate.
Now, there are 64 bit sampling DAC's, and I'm wondering how much the ear actually does hear from the sampling, or if it's something else entirely that's making the digital sound better?
Any insightful opinions or perspectives?
Thanks.
- ...
- 51 posts total
- 51 posts total