@motokokusanagi -- I completely agree with you about acoustic panels. I'm quite familiar with GIK and use them in the media room where my main system is setup.
https://systems.audiogon.com/systems/9424
https://systems.audiogon.com/systems/9424
What comes after Harbeth 30.1s?
@motokokusanagi -- I completely agree with you about acoustic panels. I'm quite familiar with GIK and use them in the media room where my main system is setup. https://systems.audiogon.com/systems/9424 |
@orfeo_monteverdi -- that's certainly very good advice. "Don't fix it if it ain't broken," as the saying goes. I'm going to give Fritz Carrera BE a try in the next week or so. I will be in a position to compare the Carrera and M30.1s side by side for a few weeks. It definitely has a tough act (M30.1s) to follow. Let the best speaker win! If I do end up keeping my 30.1s, then I agree that the next logical step is 30.2. |
I actually don't have an issue with the treble to be honest ... yes, I know that's one of the things I mentioned earlier. I guess I'm just looking for a different experience ... either that, or I'm terribly confused, lol! As @jjss49 mentioned, perhaps this is a case of not fully appreciating what I already have. But sometimes, there's only one way to find out. I'm going to compare the 30.1s with Fritz Carrera BE next week. Who knows, I might end up keeping the 30.1s after all. TBH, I'm really nitpicking at this point. Harbeth speaks to me in a way no other speaker has in the past .. at least so far. |
I used 30.2 in a 12’ x 15’ x 10’ tall room with a REL t7x. I turned the room 90 degrees and went with the SHL5+/t7x with a big improvement and used quite a bit of GIK acoustic panels. I now have 40.2 and no longer need the sub. I understand this is just a study and a secondary system. My point is don’t forget a simple and relatively inexpensive subwoofer. The key is, if you like the house sound, you’re a Harbeth guy. I realize I’m a Harbeth guy and with the 40.2, I’m done. |