DAC That Punches Above Its Price Point


I’ll make it short. I’ve spent some hours reading the DAC threads on this forum. I am aware quality of digital matters as superior DACs usually the costlier ones will sound better than cheap DACs, making music sound more analog, lifelike, real, believable with all the soundstage and detail etc. All the good things. There are some who thought it’s the music that matters, and although different DACs may sound different it’s the music that makes the most difference. In other words, the differences that exist between DACs are not that important as it's all about the music. I can see the point that people are trying to make.

Back to the topic. I’ve read great things on the Denafrips Ares II and Pontus II, and other costlier high-end DACs. I’ve read about the Chord DAVE. I personally own a Chord QBD76 and have no urge to replace it with anything else since it sounds splendid in my system, for the money. I may be setting up another system and was wondering if there is a DAC in the lower price bracket that punches way above its price point, sounding close to if not better than the costlier designs.

I presume the Audioquest Black, Red or Cobalt are not worthy of consideration and sound noticeably inferior to the costlier options? FWIW I tried the Musical Fidelity M1 DAC and this one really sounded poor to my ears. Very digital sound and I stopped listening to it after a while. The Chord sounds a lot more analog, lifelike and real to my ears.

I would appreciate any advice. Thanks.


ryder
herman, for many ppl here understanding “simple” critical for sound quality path capacitor and it’s electrical model behavior, including nonlinearities, frequency dependencies, aging, dielectric loss, etc., is beyond range.
pl ping me privately if you want to discuss sound engineering problem' specifics 
My point is very simple: excellent sound component manufacturers know how to test all components, including parts used in product’s assembly, and final product test, in production flow to ensure every unit “meets the spec”, and therefore they have in place all needed test procedures, equipped with accurate test equipment and provide training for staff.

For this to be true these manufacturers would need  specifications that  include everything that affects how something sounds. 

They do know how to make sure their units meet their specifications.

 They do not know how to specify  everything that affects how something sounds so we are therefore left with one and only valid way to determine how something sounds... listen to it. Before you even go there, yes, listening tests have many  problems, but that's all we have as a final test.


herman, I agree on final sound check of any audio component in sound system, to make sure if no hum noise, microphonic effect (rubber hammer tap test), etc. 
the problem is in using “listener" as sound quality assessment, because all humans are not reliable in terms of repeatable sound grading, if they can’t see which unit is put under test. using human ears and brain is the biggest variable in ranking sound, because “listening” is biased by reviews, optical appearance, friend’s opinion, etc. just ask someone to connect different units, presumably with matched signal level etc., and listen the sound without knowing what is playing. repeat the same after cup of coffee, taking break etc.