How can a system be judged with highly processed, non acoustic music?


I basically know what an instrument or human voice sounds like. I understand that almost all recordings, analog or digital, go through some level of processing. I also know that there are many, many recordings which strive to present a natural, real sound. To me, I can best judge a system playing lightly or non processed acoustic music.
This is also my preference for listening in general. And for me, it is vinyl.
mglik
Call me crazy. I tend to evaluate the sound of a system as to whether it sounds good with the music I like, from acoustical to electronica. Is there really more to it than that?
Obviously, recording music is an electronic process-mixed and mastered. However, many recordings clearly strive to recreate the real, original sound. I would point to “Audiophile Recordings” which, mostly, are acoustic and “natural”. Surely, such recordings are sweetened and adjusted but the goal is a natural SQ.
A room a studio, a concert hall even outdoors they all contribute to the sound you finally hear.When I was a kid on Saturday nights there was a bar across the street from where I lived  .The guys would sing Doo woop under the no 7 IRT train line the el was concert and it had an echo you could hear for blocks.These guys ,some of them anyway sounded so great.Just them sing under the El.......
why do some have to put it to committee or think tank to know if it sounds good?