Fuses


I’ve read of views on whether amp fuses impart any sound quality or coloring. I had a recent experience that has made me re-think my views (fuses do not affect sound) and wondered if others had a similar experience. 
I have a Line Magnetic integrated amp. After heavy regular use for over 5 years, one day it just wouldn’t power up. After checking the power supply, I assumed it must be a blown fuse. I recalled that Line Magnetic sent with the amp two replacement fuses of the same type/quality that was pre-installed. I dug out one of them from storage, replaced the fuse and the amp powered up normally. 

What surprised and delighted me was the change in sound with the replacement fuse. Fuller bass, more detail and more warmth. I have rolled the tubes several times in the amp, and am attuned to the subtle changes that can make. Popping in a fresh fuse seems to have had a similar affect. And these appear to be cheap fuses, available for a few dollars at most. I don’t think I understand any of this. 
bmcbrad
Just based on a preponderance of the testimonials the fuses may be exerting some effect. But, Millercarbon, your “test” as you describe it, is biased, and its reliability does not rise above the testimonial. For example, the FDA would never approve a drug based in a bunch of testimonials. Finally, if a consumer pays several hundred dollars for a tweak, and it has no effect, then consumer would either have to seek a refund or tolerate a noxious cognitive dissonance. The brain may take a third path,  the path of least resistance, that is, to believe in the tweek.
My posts concern testing & evaluation, not the efficacy of fuses or other tweaks.
Which circle of Dante's Hell is this? 
How many times does one beat a dead horse?
Why is it all the newcomers think they have the reasoned answers that have been shot to hell long ago?

All the best,
Nonoise
Slow work day so let me tease this one apart.
Just based on a preponderance of the testimonials the fuses may be exerting some effect.

So you’re saying they exert an effect directly on the mind then. Interesting.

But, Millercarbon, your “test” as you describe it, is biased, and its reliability does not rise above the testimonial.
All tests are biased. Say you decide to test voltage. Then you are biased to voltage. Even the method chosen to measure the voltage will affect the results. You have to choose one or another. Every choice reflects a bias. There is no test you can perform that is not biased in some way.

For example, the FDA would never approve a drug based in a bunch of testimonials.
Yes well bad sound never killed anyone. So far as we know. Allowances for your system, of course.
Finally, if a consumer pays several hundred dollars for a tweak, and it has no effect, then consumer would either have to seek a refund or tolerate a noxious cognitive dissonance.

Ahh yes, the noxious cognitive dissonance of the money back guarantee. Right. You got me.

The brain may take a third path, the path of least resistance, that is, to believe in the tweek.


I am reminded that it’s not worthwhile to  challenge The Orthodoxy of True Believers.