tomic601, apology for misinterpreting your comment. Seems you have a great deal of experience with mics. Thanks for sharing.
How can a system be judged with highly processed, non acoustic music?
I basically know what an instrument or human voice sounds like. I understand that almost all recordings, analog or digital, go through some level of processing. I also know that there are many, many recordings which strive to present a natural, real sound. To me, I can best judge a system playing lightly or non processed acoustic music.
This is also my preference for listening in general. And for me, it is vinyl.
This is also my preference for listening in general. And for me, it is vinyl.
- ...
- 59 posts total
| Post removed |
Speaking of Fazioli. Interesting comparison. Rolls Royce? I’m not so sure. https://youtu.be/mrB8IthgoRQ |
For me yes.... Metallica is like a very good detailed " white and black" drawing...At best.... A lute piece very well recorded is like a color oil paintings...Or a rendition of Chopin or Listz at the piano.... The sonic "cues" are way more subtle and evoke way more subtle mix of emotions...For me.... i like the group "Nightwatch" for example but i listen to only the albums with their first female singer.... The voice add to the group something more poetic and more natural....a unique set of colors.... She was a classical singer educated.... Amplified or electronically amplified instruments for me sound more "white /black" pixellation...And natural acoustical sound more like oil paintings... |
- 59 posts total