On ''what there is''

Now it's just plain boring.

roxy, ''it is boring'' is very different from 'boring according to me''.
Why are you assuming that ''it IS boring'' is , uh, ''general feeling''? 
Do you think that you represent human kind by your statement? 
Your are not ''the king'' of communist North Korea who even
surpassed the French king who stated ''the state that is I''. 
''Assumed assumptions'' is a way of speaking . Economy of
language use is that many things are assumed to be known''
A : ''Federer won of course''. B: ''who is Federer? ''
X ''has the right'', etc , but why does he need to prove his
right to judge when Y claims ''the same right''. What does ''the
same right'' mean?  Well the judge has, so to speak, an list
of legal conditions which need to be satisfy in order for X to get
the right which is assumed a priori to be already his . Something
like new owners of an home for which first payment is made.
That is when bank owns 99% of the home or its value while 
 the new buyers have the illusion to own a home.  So it seems
much of our believes is ''based'' on sand? 

Yes nandric, I meant boring according to me, although I will bet that there are others. You see, I was using "economy of language".
You may now continue with your pointless monologue...

roxy expect to be amused for free while his ''job'' is to give
his valuation in his ''economic language'' in which expression''dialogue'' does not exist but well ''monologue''.
According to
roxy I am the only member in this thread talking to my self.
Ergo there are, except roxy , no other members involved such
that he can be involved in discussion with other but only with
himself. This then can be called ''monologue''.  I am too lazy
to count other members with their post on which my reaction,
sorry ''monologue'' followed. Because his ''economy''  imply
''savings'' this economy can do without ''dialogue'' or ''discussion''
because there is no place next to qualifications of contributions
of other . So our duty is to satisfy roxy with interesting for him
contribution  in order to avoid his di-satisfaction. What an ... 

Even I know who Federer is. And I don't follow chess.