Ayre CX7e or Resolution Audio Opus 21 OR?

I'm your man.....I auditioned the first Ayre CX-7 series player and I've owned the stock Opus and the newer CX-7/e version. I'm now using the GNSC modified Opus, which is much better than the CX-7e or stock Opus as the dimensionality is much improved and the bass is wicked tight and solid. When I first heard it in my space, I was floored by the difference...the resonation of piano keys in the room was amazing, and the bass incredible.

The original Ayre player seemed to me to suffer from some timing issues. When I listened, the music seemed to be a step or two slower than it should have been. I compared it to the Cary 306-200, which seemed to get timing just right. This is corrected and then some in the "e" version player.

I think you'd be hard pressed to identifiy which one is better--both the CX-7e and Opus are very good. I'd specualte that the Ayre maybe a bit more lively and dimensional in comparison, the Opus a bit more subtle and subdued (IMHO). If you do enough digging, these players have been compared quite a bit before. I would think it might come down to your needs. The Opus has a digital input, the Ayre doesn't. The Opus isn't as good looking as the Ayre, but comes in a much smaller package and is less obvious on a rack.

Hope this helps....

I have the CX-7e. I would describe it as a well-balanced player. Strong bass, yet extended highs, and very dynamic. It does a good job with instumental timbre and presents a deep soundstage. See if you can find a dealer that will let you take one home for the weekend. That did the trick for me.

I have not heard the Opus, so I can't help you with the comparison you're looking for.

The cx-7 has more extended highs and is more detailed than the opus 21.Both are very dynamic however at times i believe the cx-7 has a more tuneful bass.Both are superb players.Your system (synergy)and personal preference will be the deciding factor as usual.

Can someone comment on what improvements were made in the "e" version?