I’m as obsessed with the
Quest for the Absolute Sound as anyone else on this site (well, almost anyone;
that’s not an accolade I aspire to anyway). But I’m almost as often troubled by
my own obsession as I am gratified by it. I’ve never been what used to be
called a gadget freak; just as I use computers as tools for research and
writing, not as ends in themselves, for most of my life stereo equipment has
been a means to the end of listening to the music I love. But now that I can
finally afford really good equipment—things I’ve lusted after since college,
more than 40 years ago—I’m dismayed at the extent to which my love of music
has morphed into a love of music reproduction. So this little rant is a
chance to vent frustration, and to see if there are others out there who may
feel the same way. The rant takes a specific form: a book review.
Robert Harley’s The
Complete Guide to High-End Audio has been praised on this forum as a kind
of bible for audiophiles. It’s certainly as massive a tome at the Bible. And,
depending on your religious views, it is perhaps almost as full of Revealed
Truth or tendentious myth (take your pick). Moreover, I’ll concede that Mr.
Harley frequently reminds us, after going into great detail about some aspect
of music reproduction technology, that the last thing the reader should do when
listening is to focus on the details he’s just described—that we’re all in it
for the music, not for the equipment. Yes, he says this frequently (he says
everything frequently). And yet…
The book, in its Fourth
Edition, is 529 pages long (the Table of Contents alone is 9 pages long).
They’re big pages, too. Some of them—for the most part, the best of them, in my
opinion—are “technical,” explaining the theory of acoustics, “Sound and
Hearing,” basic facts about the physics of electricity, and so forth. Harley
writes clearly, but evidently has a mind that is organized like the
architecture of a Gothic cathedral, displaying the analytical excesses and
mania for hierarchies of Medieval Scholasticism. Like a lawyer, Harley seems to
think that every particular detail must be made explicit, even in situations
where symmetry (e.g., left and right speaker terminals) make half of those
specifics clear without actually specifying them. This habit gives very little
credit to the reader’s intelligence and makes Harley’s prose tedious. There are
chapters (each with multiple sub-headings) on Choosing a System; Preamps, Power
amps and Integrated amps; Speakers; Disc Players, Transports and DACs; Music
Servers; Turntables, Tonearms and Cartridges; Tuners and various kinds of
internet radio; Cables and Interconnects; Home Theater; Multichannel Audio;
Setup “Secrets” (in two separate chapters, one of these covering “Audiophile
Accessories”—i.e., tweaks); Specifications and Measurements—and, of course,
Appendices (A-C) on various topics not, presumably, already covered. Need I say
that there’s also a Glossary? Harley leaves no stone unturned. And yet…
I find the book
exasperating, and a manifestation of many of the problems with audiophilia in
general that lead music lovers down rabbit holes of fetish. Here are a few
specific problems.
Let me begin by repeating
myself, thereby following Harley’s example. Everything Harley says, he says
again and again, first in “introductory” chapters, then in the pages of
chapters devoted to the topic at issue (where the basic points are repeated
several times), then again in “Summaries” of those chapters, and then yet
again in subsequent chapters where the topic that had already been
discussed to death might possibly be construed as relevant. But maybe
“discussed to death” is undue praise, since mere repetition of the same
points is not, after all, a way of exhaustively examining any question. If
ever there was a book that could more profitably be read quickly and cursorily
than carefully, this is that book; it would be far more useful if it were less
than half as long. And, besides the chapters on technical matters I’ve already
referred to, there is really very little in it that goes much beyond common
sense.
Indeed, the theoretical
sophistication evident in the technical sections rarely seems to be much in
evidence in the evaluations or recommendations of particular choices facing the
would-be purchaser. And “purchaser” is the operative term here: again and
again, I have the feeling that Harley is a shill for the audio equipment
industry—not for any particular company, mind you, but of the industry as a
whole, since his book rarely discourages any possible equipment purchase. This
is not to say that he doesn’t tailor his advice for one sort of listener or
another; you’ll find plenty to confirm your choice of vinyl over digital (or
vice versa), of tubes over solid state (or vice versa), of SET amplifiers, or
Class A, or Class D, or expensive cables or power cords, without reference to
particular manufacturers. If you want to BUY, there will be pages in Harley’s
book that will encourage you to do so.
But this enthusiast’s all-in
attitude runs into various rhetorical problems, as it must. To cite just one
example: superlatives like “extraordinary,” “outstanding,” “significant,” “spectacular”
are used so often, at every stage of the music reproduction process, that it
becomes impossible to know what sort of weight to give them in any particular
context. If power cords can create a “spectacular” improvement—but so can
interconnects, and speaker cables, and power conditioners, and well-made racks—it’s
hard to know how much weight to give big-ticket items like amplifiers and
speakers and other basic elements of one’s system, not to mention undeniably
important elements like room acoustics and proper speaker placement. According
to Harley, they’re all capable of making “spectacular” or “significant”
improvements to sound quality. But “spectacular” is a strong word; there aren’t
many that are stronger. If an AC power cord can create such an effect, it’s
hard to know what adjective to choose in order to distinguish a boom box or an
MP3 on cheap ear buds from an uncompromising rig that costs tens of thousands
of dollars. That might perhaps be described as a “spectacular”
difference—although even here, such a superlative is in questionable taste. I
know plenty of talented musicians and passionate music lovers who can enjoy
even difficult to reproduce music on cheap ear buds almost as much as
they would on a system most of us would call “spectacular.”
And then, despite his
analytical care and thoroughness, Harley often contradicts himself, both in the
specific recommendations he makes, and even in his own application of his
knowledge of audio science in particular circumstances. For instance, in
discussing bi-wiring, Harley offers a (possibly) plausible explanation of how
and why it makes a beneficial difference—and then declares that “no one knows
how or why” bi-wiring works! Here is the relevant passage: “In a bi-wired
system, the power amplifier ‘sees’ a higher impedance on the tweeter cable at
low frequencies and a lower impedance at high frequencies. The opposite is true
in the woofer-half of the bi-wired pair. This causes the signal to be split up,
with high frequencies traveling mostly in the pair driving the loudspeaker’s
tweeter circuit and low frequencies conducted by the pair connected to the
loudspeaker’s woofer circuit. This frequency splitting…reduces magnetic
interactions in the cable, resulting in better sound. The large magnetic fields
set up around the conductors by low-frequency energy can’t affect the transfer
of treble energy. No one knows exactly how or why bi-wiring works [wait a
minute! Didn’t he just explain “how” and “why” bi-wiring works?], but on nearly
all loudspeakers with bi-wiring provisions, it makes a big improvement in the
sound. Whatever your cable budget, you should bi-wire if your loudspeaker has
bi-wired inputs, even if it means buying two runs of less expensive cables.”
Even on its own terms, The Complete Guide to High-End Audio
is self-defeating. Most of the “audiophile values” Harley identifies and
cherishes are subjective, not objective, and so not the kinds of things one can
hope to demonstrate or prove. At the very outset of the book, he quotes the
Hungarian-born scientist and philosopher Michael Polanyi (also recently mentioned
by our own Mahgister); that got my attention, as I studied Polanyi’s work with
one of his disciples at the University of Chicago when I was a grad student.
But Harley doesn’t seem to take to heart Polanyi’s main contribution to the
philosophy of science: that objective facts cannot account for what is most
valuable in human culture. Rather, it is not science, but art—poetry,
music, myth, religion, and other “acts of imagination”—that can provide the
foundation of meaning in life. Harley’s attempt at a systematic
compendium of objective facts, although it fails even to be this, more
conspicuously betrays his own many pleas that the reader not heed measurements,
statistics, and other facts but return to the music.
Just as Wine Spectator is wine porn, and Stereophile,
The Absolute Sound, and (gasp!) Audiogon are audio porn, Harley’s book
will find its enthusiasts. Harley speaks of “audiophile values,” and pays lip
service to the music repeatedly, but perhaps it’s time to think in terms of
“audiophile virtues” instead. Don’t get me wrong: I’m no prude, and
audiophilia is a relatively victimless vice, if you can afford it and your wife
can tolerate it. But the analogy is not gratuitous. Didn’t we all get “into
audio” because we love music? Shouldn’t a healthy love of music
recognize that, although endless purchasing and tweaking may bring slight
improvements in sound quality, the false promise of that ever-elusive fantasy
Object of Desire is a distraction from a reality which is, for all of us
audiophiles, already far sexy enough? I can’t speak for you, obviously, but
speaking for myself, it’s high time to get back to the music!
