High Fidelity Sound Speaker

"FR has no such flaws that YOUR speakers have."

No mozartfan, except that your FR drivers will reside in a F'ed-up cabinet. They won't stand a chance.

WEll Just doubled ck Cube auditions on YT

hummmm

Look its true a  video can;'t replace the actual experience

I agree

,,,however,...

I'm no so sure Cube outshoots the DavidLouis

Cube nice magnet motor  + Paper cone + various whizzers

DavidLouis Nice Magnet motor + wood cone + a  single whizzer.

Honestly I can not say if i will like what I hear in the Cube sound field

The way I judge a  speaker is not like anyone  else that makes  a  critique.

The way I critque a speaker is to block out bass and highs.

My only cncern is midrange,  300hz through the  4khz band width.

Somewhere around those numbers.

What I exclude is the deepest bass say 30hz-100hz and highs from 12khz up to whoknowswhere.

I have my reasons why I critque in this fashion.

I'm queing into where I know the magic has to be real. Bass and highs I can get from just about any assist speakers. No big deal

I want to hear how the critical mid band width is voiced, tones, colors, timbers, any resonances, spikes, colorations, etc etc.

This is how I establish what is high fidelity and what speakers are not making the grade as high fidelity.

Now I have to go back and delete all my comments today about Cube Neuphar.

As I am not so sure about Cube's mid band width voicing.

Just waiting on David to get back with me so we can set up a  time I can hear his Cube Neuphar.

Thing is I place the mic right up next to the DLVX8, what you hear in my videos is pretty much the sound in real time

So if you do not like what you hear in my DLVX8 videos , truth is you will not like the sound of the DLVX8. 

Now I know Davidlouis does not wish I say this comment, But its pretty close the same, video and real time.

I am hoping what I hear in the Cube video is not like what i hear in real time.

I am going to be honest about the whole affair.

But lets also consider we all have different set of ears, as now is the new popluar smoothing over catch phrase.

Its not politically correct to have a  definite opinion about speakers.. 

Well I don't abide by this all forgiving type assessments.

Eithera  speaker has fidelity or it does not, and to what degree it has or does not have midrange fidelity.

I am forgiving  as far as lower sensitivity, like the Seas Excel line. These drivers are high fidelity , but at a  significant loss in db sensitivity.

But when we come to FR, I am not at all forgiving.

No forgiving spirit when we come to FR vs FR.

We are here after which speaker has best overall midrange band width.

I've since deleted Voxativ from my considerations. 

This leaves

Cube Neuphar and AER for me to make a   compare to the Davidlouis.

I have some issues with things posted on AER's web site, So this leaves, Cube as my only interest as a  possible competition with DavidLouis.

So now I have my friends FX250 SET amp,, with pure colbalt out trans,,, I understand what the **Linear SET magic** is all about,,

 In most light jazz quartets, classical chamber,,SETs + FR offer a  sublime sound image which xover type speakers and PP amps can not match 

Sorry, just can;t

However,, when it comes down to it I'll take a  good PP amp overa  SET,,I need the dynamics. 

Besides my FR always hasa  nice linera sound stage. 

But witha  ultra linera SET + Linear FR,,= wow factor pure sublime, music just listly floats across the room, light and magical.

.

Again I need a  PP amp, as i need a  speaker assist with my music.

Midwoofers going to 1400hz++ and a  tweeter 5khz = 15k+hz

So  when you add up dual W18's + tweeter + FR,, ohm load is now right near 2 ohms.. which makes it hard for a SET amp to be happy.

Just some random thoughts I'd share as to whats going on in my system,,,, W6 FR on the way, Gonna throw that into the  mix.