High Fidelity Sound Speaker

Yeah the cabinets are off, but consider its basically off by 1 inch H and 1 inch in width,,,actually the 30 inch H has side walls on the OUTSIDE of front face,, the 29 inch H has the walls,,,,on the inside,,,ohh wait,, thats makes for less Q  not more,,,ok so the 29 incher with side walls inside of face,, is maybe 1 liter-2 liter vol less than the 30 inch H cabinet..

Does anyone here really believe,,btw neither port are measured, its all about the same size posrts,,, does anyone here really believe 1 cab with 50 liters and the other 48 liters is going to notea  dif in sound to the avg listener???

Come on, evena spec-ograph can't pick up dif wave forms 1 vs the other.

I'm not perfectionist thats for sure,

But what I do want perfect is the construct of the driver itsself.

Look my tech's magneplanar 3 pannel or 4 pannel each channel speakers will have a  more huge soundstage , as i told him. 

But he has to deal with that sweet spot thing,, which I can't not accept.

If my dual FR  project works out,, I may indeed have reivented the highest fidelity speaker system. 

No one else in the world has sucha  design on record. I've googled several times and come up with zero.

I may be the 1st.

And there are reasons why it may just work out.

Wilson's won;'t touch my midrange, neither Sonus faber.

Zu's dual drivers can not compete witha  dual FR.

Not when Davidlouis is in the cabinet.

I bet no more than 5 USA audiophiles own the DLVX8.

This is the reason no one has heard about this speaker. 

So as you know, I never rest in my never ending search of possibilities in FR techology

I decided to take a  closer look at Cube Neuphar  made in Poland, due to a  member here who lives near , has the Cube.

So what turned me away from cking Cube more closerly, earlier was the multiple cones and the price, out my budget..

Then just tonight I decided to make further investigations.

Glad I did.

Seems the older W8 model is pretty much what I am looking for. 1 whizzer and just at my limit $2k

Read this review

**as near perfect as perfection is going to GET..** which is what i have been mantra-ing these past months here on Audiogon.

WEll now we have a  independent review of what Im also have found to be  accurate.

I'd say Cube would be my 1st choice in higher end FR.

The **magnetic motor** looks something different and cool vs AER's standard magnet motor.

+ Cube offersa  10 unch,,which may get into trouble,,,,ahhh now I see why the multiple whizzers on the W10.

That explains THAT.

A 10 will offer bigger bass, but at a  sacrifice,,,so soloution? Add 2 more whizzers = problem solved.

Bass from a  10 inch cone + 3 whizzers for mids/highs.

Got it.

Not sure If I wanta   10, as my rm is too small, and the Jadis Defy7 has 12 Mundorf .47 SESGO caps, which offers lots of nice added punch to the bass.

8 inch suits me fine,,at the moment

xover type speakers that you have in YOUR system are ~~flawed~~

You don't know it, due to all sorts of factors which I won't go into to

FR has no such flaws that YOUR speakers have

Here read this accurate review on the Cube

**perfect as close to perfection as can be..** thats all i am trying to get across.

YOUR speakers are far away from this standard.

But you are unaware of these flaws.

Last comment, witha  Cube 10,,its possible you will not need  your Wilson, Sonus faber, Dali, Theil, Tektonas as **assist* for the 10.

Why
The 10 will offer nice rich bass and with extended highs.

With a Cube W8,  now you will have to re-tweak your xover in your Wilson, Dali, Sonus Faber at different points, as a  **assist* speaker which will pad up lows and highs on the Cube W8

Follow>

Yeah I know you just spent $10,000 on the Sonus Faber,, make that $30K..and $30k on  Wilson, Dali at $30k , which now are only workable as assist mode to support the Crown Jewel, the Cube W8.

Thats all the xover types are good for now, assist, these low sens types now serve as padding. Nothing more .

Unlike Stereophiles flawed reviews, I did not say liars, here in this review you can read non-snakeoil honest comments  about the values of a  higher end FR speaker

http://v2.stereotimes.com/post/cube-audio-nenuphar-loudspeakers-by-mike-girardi/

"FR has no such flaws that YOUR speakers have."

No mozartfan, except that your FR drivers will reside in a F'ed-up cabinet. They won't stand a chance.

WEll Just doubled ck Cube auditions on YT

hummmm

Look its true a  video can;'t replace the actual experience

I agree

,,,however,...

I'm no so sure Cube outshoots the DavidLouis

Cube nice magnet motor  + Paper cone + various whizzers

DavidLouis Nice Magnet motor + wood cone + a  single whizzer.

Honestly I can not say if i will like what I hear in the Cube sound field

The way I judge a  speaker is not like anyone  else that makes  a  critique.

The way I critque a speaker is to block out bass and highs.

My only cncern is midrange,  300hz through the  4khz band width.

Somewhere around those numbers.

What I exclude is the deepest bass say 30hz-100hz and highs from 12khz up to whoknowswhere.

I have my reasons why I critque in this fashion.

I'm queing into where I know the magic has to be real. Bass and highs I can get from just about any assist speakers. No big deal

I want to hear how the critical mid band width is voiced, tones, colors, timbers, any resonances, spikes, colorations, etc etc.

This is how I establish what is high fidelity and what speakers are not making the grade as high fidelity.

Now I have to go back and delete all my comments today about Cube Neuphar.

As I am not so sure about Cube's mid band width voicing.

Just waiting on David to get back with me so we can set up a  time I can hear his Cube Neuphar.