LSA Voyager GAN 350 its problem is power wire (AC DC)only 16 AWG, that design was too little to good sound, 14 AWG or above is better .
That's the least of this amp's problems. The basic design is subpar.
LSA Voyager GAN Amplifier
What is so funny is that these "science is truth" people have no truth. There are no double blind linstening tests that confirm one measurement is better than another. We all know that in drag racing the fastest car gets the trophy. There is no trophy in audio because none of these fake scientists have ever performed a test that has any meaning. It is really a belief system based on wiggles on a scope and numbers....all signifying nothing. It is a lie....plain and simple. I would not go so far to state that these people are all lying for they are just converts of this religion and believe it to be the truth. However, there is not one test that I have ever seen that correlates measurements with sound......none.....please show me one. The guy at ASR believes that if a preamp/DAC/amp has a certain number then it is "transparent" and that an even better number is not needed. He has no idea what he is talking about since he never listens to anything. It is just his guess. If you think your guess is truth......and you know its a guess.....then you are promoting lies...... So, you have two camps of belief. Neither camp has any proof of anything. What the measurement camp has is righteouness but they know deep in their hearts they have no science that proves that the numbers they worship are actually meaningfull. The other camp has no proof that something they listen to is truly better than something else.....but, at least for each person, they have listened themselves and made up their mind which they "think" is best....based on direct experience. Most audiophiles believe their ears......some only believe in wiggles and numbers. Seems to me the more intelligent way to get great sound is to listen. But, to each his own. Which lie do you want to promote. The lie of measurments or the lie of listening. I prefer the lie of listening. When I do listening tests with several people.....we all hear the same thing.....so at least its a group lie....he he. So, which snake has the bestest oil? The measurement snake or the listening snake? You decide. Have a blessed day you beautiful ones.....I hug you and squeeze your cheeks.and kiss you all with all my passion.......my sweet babies. |
The famous and insightful 1980's audiophile Ronald Reagan got it right: Trust but verify. Verifying is the tricky part. You can take an already good sounding system, a prime candidate for some "tweak" to try and make it even better, do nothing, and it will still sound good, probably even different to the user each time it is listened to. Can be many factors at play including changes in weather and physiology day to day. Not to mention mindset. No mind, no sound. Some will have more concrete standards to verify than others, like a clear explanation of how something works that makes sense. Then the value proposition comes into play. Hardcore audiophiles like Mr. TBV: R. Reagan might perceive great value with very minor changes, and be inclined to spend more money for it. YMMV. It is what it is. Where things head south is when one merely trusts. Lots of folks out there who want your money. Gotta be careful. Verify! |
Who are you to stand in judgment of anything? You seem to have an AX to grind with Wally and LSA. @kuribo Looking at your history of posts all you do is blast amplifier builders for not building their Class D amps with Purfi (and I think the NAD stuff sound atrocious and I have owned them) and you have blasted every GaN amplifier with the exception of Leo and his Orchard so if Bruno Putzeys or Leo are not the developer it is garbage? Like I said looking through all 134 of your posts you are a polluter and just sling mud. You truly are a troll and bring nothing to the table. |