The Big Misconception About Electricity


This vid goes quite a ways down the road to explaining why:

1)  Power cords make a not so subtle difference.

2) Cable elevators should not be looked at askance.

 

Regards, barts

128x128barts
Post removed 

@yuviarora ,

 

Any person who publicly writes this is in the latter 20th century or 21st century is a nutcase. Keep in mind it is you that is advancing the people who wrote this.

 

The evidence suggests that only a few thousand years ago planets moved close to the earth, producing electrical phenomena of intense beauty and terror.
 
We contend that humans once saw planets suspended as huge spheres in the heavens. Immersed in the charged particles of a dense plasma, celestial bodies "spoke" electrically and plasma discharge produced heaven-spanning formations above the terrestrial witnesses.

The electric universe notion is as whacked as a flat earth. You’d have to reject almost everything we’ve discovered and tested for centuries, even Newton’s gravitational laws. Even discussing this is nuts.

I believe it was Sagan who said , it's good to have an open mind but not so open your brains fall out. 

@teo_audio ,

 

The study characterizes the fluctuations in the shock waves of vehicles traveling at speeds of Mach 2 to 10 and is modeled in one dimension.

Please explain what in audio travels at supersonic speeds, and hence the relevance to your link and audio?

Much of the study in the field of hypersonics focuses on understanding the disturbances in the flow of gases near the surface of the vehicle—the boundary layer—rather than what's happening in the shock, which typically occurs in the front of the vehicle.

Again, how relevant?  This is the common foible, error, tactic? so common in audio discussions whether DACs, digital, cables, etc. Bring up something remotely related, then do no work to show relevancy and no work to put a figure on it that how relevancy, then claim "that is why I hear .....".  You claim to be a "man of science" in your posts, but posting links and making dubious claims of relevance is most definitely not science.

Cindyment. member since Nov 30, 2021

One day. 65 posts since then.

the stench is high with this one.

Repeat offender, trying again.

when will this forum enact IP source checking, i wonder. Although, that tack, to help prevent repeat offenders from attacking the given forum or comments section, tends to be a bit less useful, since the advent of VPNs. However, it could be useful to block the use of VPNs on this forum. But I do not know of the specifics of such implementation. Costs, complexities, and so on, with regard to conflicts or compatibility with the forum’s software, as it exists.

 

all we know is tha right now, the forum is definitely and continually under attack from nutbars who come in and are obviously repeat offenders who are here under new name name after new name after new name... again and again and again, and they show no sign of stopping their attacks of the forum.

New member flood control is probably possible. Ie, limit to a few posts a day for at least a week. where, if they go to flooding the forum after a week then the pattern would be clear to the moderation and ownership. That would be preferable to this current 'new members continual flooding of the forum from day one' -problem.