@djones51 ,
This is what happens when people don't think things through. Oh, that looks like an arc discharge anomaly. Well ya, but that does not mean it is. So many obvious flaws w.r.t craters being caused by "electrical discharge"
- Discharge would be lower power (compared to impact)
- Being low power, it would require a long sustain
- Requiring a long sustain, that would require the planets to not be moving or rotating.
- Being low power, things would "melt" not "explode", so where is the lake of literal glass
- You would need complimentary features on other celestial bodies
I feel silly even writing this. It's like trying to justify that Harry Potter is real.