I dont need Ted products nor the DSP refine processing of our friend cindyment...
Why? Because my audio system is embedded in ACOUSTIC passive materials treatment and more importantly mechanically controlled with Helmholtz method...
Is my system better than the system of Ted or cindyment ? No
But it is so good i dont give a dam about upgrade... My system is under 500 bucks... All my device are homemade...
By the way we could create a soundstage out of the speakers and a good imaging WITHOUT great tonal timbre accuracy, but i cannot and i think nobody could create a natural great tonal timbre accuracy WITHOUT in addition gain a great soundstage...This is simply acoustic laws...
In acoustic reproduction of timbre ask for an acoustically controlled room...
But if i can create an impression and an image filling the room without great tonal accuracy...i cannot create a tonal accuracy without at the same time creating a good soundstage...
Take my word for a personal experience, i am not a scientist like cindyment or a master in audio like Ted...
Feel free to contradict me...
A system does not sound good because we feel it is good.... A system sound good with minimal acoustical settings... If not it is an happy illusion... All my system were bad all my life and i always tought that they sounded good...
i realized that after my listening experiments in acoustic for the last years mostly...
i dont need my 7 headphones anymore nor any upgrade...
My system is not the best in audiogon for sure.... For the ratio S.Q./price it is the better or one of the better... 500 bucks for my audio system...
Dont upgrade before embedding mechanically and electrically and acoustically all the gear...This is my only discovery in audio....