If someone own a perfectly controllled refine DSP system, like cindyment, for sure he will not need cable, fuses, or Schuman generators...Nor a complete grid of Helmholtz resonators fine tuned for the speakers...The ancestor of electronical DSP is mechanical Helmholtz equalization of a room....😊 I am pretty sure our friend cindyment know that...
Because anybody who knows enough about DSP can reach a good S.Q. without that....
Myself i dont use DSP, i am not knowleadgeable in DSP and dont have the money to buy it, i used some homemade devices for controlling vibrations for example....
I used Helmholtz method in acoustic at peanuts costs...
But i dont denigrate the power of DSP...
It is ridiculous then to denigrate other ways... Like controlling acoustics or vibrations or even other controversials devices...
The only important matter is that it is not money who give a good sound most of the times but experiments and ELEMENTARY science....At peanuts costs if we know what to do....
Then someone could be right with DSP control or like me with my homemade devices...It is useless to argue for one and denigrate the others...
The more important truth is elementary science is enough....at low costs...
i develop at no cost my own way to control mechanical,electrical,and acoustical embeddings of the system... The most powerful being Helmholtz method... is it better than DSP ? No...
But it cost me NOTHING and it is so good all my 7 headphones sleep forever in a drawer...
The truth of one sometimes dont contradict the truth of another because the world of possible experiences is so vast it can accomodate many perspectives...
Let me give you my take on this. I will even state that I think most tweaks are ludicrous.