Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

Steven R Gundry

Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712

• This article has an expression of concern

Abstract

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2^nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

This heart inflammation and damage occurs after 2 shots, what happens after 3, or 4, or 5, or 6, or the 14 the Government of Australia is planning for it’s citizens?

You people better wake the F up now, or you will end being just another statistic. 

I've had 3 shots, took the Flu vaccine same time as the last one. My hearts so friggen large my MD said anymore and they will have to start taking out some of those useless organs to make room. 

I’m really trying to stay out of this dumpster fire thread but that’s the funniest thing I’ve read all day.

cleeds, by all means, jump in and join the fun. This is like shooting fish in a cracker barrel. 

All the best,
Nonoise

@yuviarora ,

In case you have not figured it out yet, i both have access and know my way around academic research:

The paper was retracted for a number of reasons including questionable ethics of the submitter, and it is apparently full of errors, even at the most basic, i.e. the name of the test.

https://retractionwatch.com/2021/11/30/abstract-linking-covid-19-vaccines-to-heart-trouble-risk-earns-expression-of-concern/

Comment made by someone,

I graphed the data from the abstract, it doesn’t support the claims, basically, the inflammatory markers are not elevated. The error bars are very wide and overlap substantially between pre- and post- vax measures, which means there is no meaningful difference between the figures. There is a large range of other issues with the data, but principally they are using an algorithm that is meant to weigh long-term risk factors against the risk of cardiac events, not transient changes associated with infection or vaccination as well as using an algorithm meant for individual risk to estimate group risk without reporting confidence intervals.