The Big Misconception About Electricity


This vid goes quite a ways down the road to explaining why:

1)  Power cords make a not so subtle difference.

2) Cable elevators should not be looked at askance.

 

Regards, barts

barts

By the way in a complex field like electricity debunking Tesla with arguments like he was not alone, others created transformer lines and worked in AC is completely meaningless for 2 reasons...

First in a complex field for sure there exist hundreds of discoveries and researchers , Tesla cannot be alone...Saying that Tesla dont invented x ray for example because Rontgen invented them also at the same time dont means that Tesla was a tinkerer or a fraud by any means save for idiot...

Second the impact of Tesla is well recognized ALREADY in the SERIOUS book of CARLSON BY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS... the title is not Tesla the Tinkerer but "Tesla the inventor of the electrical age "...

Then cindyment write to Carslson and explain to princeton university press why their title is a fraud...They will listen to a great scientist like you....

BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY the legacy of Tesla is not behind ANYWAY but PROBABLY forward, ether theory was coming back...And Tesla was the only one to constructed all an electrical theory of ether manifested in patents like Tesla coil and other patents linked to his way to transmitted electricity...Nothing of Tesla idea was EVER proved to be wrong, they were ABANDONNED and dismissed with the Einstein success....

Dismissing ideas from one scientist WITHOUT RESEARCH about them because the dominating new pradigm of Einstein empty spacetime theory dismiss ether is not PROOF...

Our actual cosmology is EPICYCLES theory now BORN from Einstein idea dismissing ether, no one understand anymore...Certainly not you....

Then it is not the electrical model who is right so much, many pointed to his inconsistencies...Perhaps it is a wrong model...

But ether theory is not so easily dismissed than the electrical model of the universe ...

Tesla worked the ether model theory of Maxwell or of Lorentz and all other physicists before einstein not by writing papers in journal but by a complete set of devices patented around this conception of electricity, everyone rejected after Einstein first successs...

But success with predictions about mercury orbit for example dont PROVE that the hypothesis behind the theory were right in the absolute sense ....

And it is easy to reject hypothesis like ether, not so easy to reject devices which WORKED ...Nobody was ever able or willing to continue Tesla research after Wardenclyffe tower financial disaster and the emerging star of Einstein NO ETHER theory......

The future look grim for Einstein empty space-time geometry, and cosmology now....Few decades after Einstein death, the quantum void was no more empty but a RESERVE of energy like it was for the old ether theory not an EMPTY volume of space at all...The futire of Tesla look bright anew... We had plenty of times to understand the limitation of Einstein conceptions in the last steriles 40 years of  epicycles cosmology...

Many books were wrote about this... Only ignorant dont know....

 

Post removed 

I forgot to say that Einstein himself revised his idea about the unnecessary ether in his 2 relativity theory by saying the opposite in 1920 because of new discoveries of Bohr atom...

 

«The important fact that, according to Bohr’s theory, the frequency of emitted radiation is not determined by electrically
charged masses undergoing periodic processes of the same frequency can only strengthen our doubt of the independent reality of the
wave field.
But even if these possibilities mature into real theories, we are not going to be able to dispense with the ether in theoretical physics,
that is, with the continuum furnished with physical properties; because the general theory of relativity, whose fundamental aspects
physicists will probably always retain, excludes any unmediated action-at-a-distance. However, every theory of contact action presupposes continuous fields, hence also the existence of an "ether.» Einstein 1920 article " On ether"...

 

Then good luck to debunk that claim of Einstein cindyment by using Einstein apparent dismissal of Tesla ether by VULGARIZATORS AND ENGINEERS who think relativity theory displace Tesla ether........Relativity theory was unable to negate Tesla ether ....

Tesla ether was NEVER dismissed, just let there to dry unattended under the sun so to speak.....

Tesla ether was an idea abandonned by scientist who did not want to tested Tesla devices and work with them anymore at all...

 

Einstein say the samething differently in a book in 1922:

«Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it.»

 

I am surprized that cindyment did not answer my last post additions...

For sure i proved nothing i am not a physicist, but i placed Tesla electrical devices output patents in the perspective and context of Tesla ether theory...Tinkerer has NO THEORY...A scientist dont invent MANY INTERRELATED devices by chance, he must have a theory to inspire him...For Tesla it was his ether theory...

And ether theory is dismissed in books by people who never read Einstein who regretted by his own many WRITTEN admission his dismissal by a restricted lecture of special relativity and restricted interpretation of Michelson Morley experiment which anyway NEVER give an exact ZERO to measure ether wind... Einstein admittted that ether theory is necessary even AFTER GENERAL relativity...

What ether was for scientists before Einstein and what Tesla ether is, are 2 things for sure.... But any intelligent person must pounder about this:

ALL PATENTS PRODUCTIONS OF TESLA WERE INSPIRED BY AN ETHER THEORY OF HIS OWN...

No scientist save Tesla has ever done so...That does not means that Tesla is right but why Tesla coil which Tesla ether theory exemplify, why these Tesla coil REVEAL UNEXPECTED phenomena ABOUT LIGHTNING unexplanable save partially by 2 Russian physicists whose theory border near Tesla ether ?

 


Where is the "great scientist" cindyment
of audio thread to debunk all that? After all i am more a poet and not a scientist myself....

No more clown to repeat Tesla is a tinkerer, and invent practically only a motor? is he tired to be childish?

Clown are precious they make us smile and we have only one here who despise all audiophiles to be ignorant like Tesla was....

 

If someone dare to read the cyndiment arguments AGAISNT Tesla they were copy/paste of Edison society to established some dates ...nobody ever claimed that TESLA invented all and everything....But saying that he invent a motor and a few tinkering devices is a LIE or total ignorance easy to reveal....