Nietzsche and Runaway Audio Consumption


Came across this today. A lot of posts bring up the issue of "how much is enough?" or "when is audio consumption justified" etc.

Does this Nietzsche aphorism apply to audio buying? You be the judge! 

Friedrich Nietzsche“Danger in riches. — Only he who has spirit ought to have possessions: otherwise possessions are a public danger. For the possessor who does not know how to make use of the free time which his possessions could purchase him will always continue to strive after possessions: this striving will constitute his entertainment, his strategy in his war against boredom. 

Thus in the end the moderate possessions that would suffice the man of spirit are transformed into actual riches – riches which are in fact the glittering product of spiritual dependence and poverty. They only appear quite different from what their wretched origin would lead one to expect because they are able to mask themselves with art and culture: for they are, of course, able to purchase masks. By this means they arouse envy in the poorer and the uncultivated – who at bottom are envying culture and fail to recognize the masks as masks – and gradually prepare a social revolution: for gilded vulgarity and histrionic self-inflation in a supposed ‘enjoyment of culture’ instil into the latter the idea ‘it is only a matter of money’ – whereas, while it is to some extent a matter of money, it is much more a matter of spirit.” 

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1996. Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits. Cambridge University Press. (p. 283-4, an aphorism no. 310)

I'm pretty sure @mahgister will want to read this one! (Because they speak so artfully about avoiding the diversion that consumption poses to the quest for true aesthetic and acoustic excellence.)

128x128hilde45

243 posts , in some parts of the world this prodigious blather would equate to a life of languid yet bittersweet  torpor…

If you read my post recommendation about books, articles, and writers and why i recommend them i dont think that  my posts are not interesting ... It is my excuse..

But i cannot deny that the OP was right about my heavy too lenghty prose...

Thanks OP to take patience with me...

I really wish you the best for your family and you...

I am very thankful for your patience...

Great remark !

Boltzman was a so great genius it is unbelievable and he kill himself because he was mocked by clowns...

But i think that the view of Karl Friston about the analysis of diisipative structure away from equilibrium and his free energy principle minimizing principle is a better way to explain these posts and to add to Boltzman thermodynamic cosmical principle...His mathematical simple treatment is very elegant and somewhat simple...He takes at the root the question what is a diferential equation and what is his relation to time...

Living structures are the mystery nowadays not so much atoms...

I think living system will teach us more about atoms than atoms would ever teach us by themselves alone about living system..

 

 

https://nautil.us/issue/86/energy/a-neuroscientists-theory-of-everything

 

merry christmast djones

 

I just view it as energy conservation.