Thiel Owners


Guys-

I just scored a sweet pair of CS 2.4SE loudspeakers. Anyone else currently or previously owned this model?
Owners of the CS 2.4 or CS 2.7 are free to chime in as well. Thiel are excellent w/ both tubed or solid-state gear!

Keep me posted & Happy Listening!
128x128jafant

ydjames

 

Thank You for supporting Mr. Rob Gillum at CSS. Keep me posted as you massage the new 2.7 coaxial drivers into your existing loudspeakers.

 

Happy Listening!

vair68robert , 

Thanks for the info, I never even knew about a passive pre amp until yesterday, I'm curious about it and given your experience will look more into it.  Honestly I have no issue with using a DAC as the pre amp, just that you read reviews that gush over pre amps, and it makes you feel like "whelp, I guess without one I'll never achieve true audio nirvana".  I guess part of the pre amp appeal to me is based around my fear of anything with a digital display as I could have an all-analog pre amp, and a simpler DAC, no touch screens or LCDs needed.

I'll look through this thread more in depth over the weekend to read more about the topic at hand, appreciate the heads up!

coop_301

The preamp or no preamp , powered preamp or passive preamp conversation has been discused more than once on Audiogons forums .

There is no right or wrong answer , unless as Tom pointed out if you have long interconnects then you need a powered preamp .

Think of it this way , if you are only using a DAC that has a volume control then go directly to the amp , why spend money on a preamp and another set of interconnects ?  Spend your money on Upgrading the interconnects from your DAC to the amp ,  just my opinion .

Have fun reading 219 pages , lots of good info .

 

 

 

 

Post removed 

@coop-301, @vair68robert offers good advice. This is a subject that has garnered a lot of conversation. As your building your system presently, I'll try to give you the skinny. Please realize that this is somewhat incomplete.

First of all, if you have analog sources, you're probably better off with an active pre.

Ideally you'd have a digital source with a voltage output equal to your amps input voltage sensitivity for full output.  Having less voltage output will negate getting all the clean power your amp is capable of producing. Having too much voltage output will increase the chance of bit stripping through volume attenuation. Having an equal voltage output/input will allow less fussy full range of the volume control.

It would be better to have a digital source with built in volume control than using an external passive pre. Having a digital source with extra bits available (such as with the now ubiquitous 32 bit chips)  to handle the volume attenuation will negate the chances of bit stripping.

It is better to use low capacitance interconnects (more likely with shorter ones) between digital source and amplification.

With the ML 23.5 with its 2.25 V input sensitivity it's more likely that with most typical 2 V (for CD) - 2.2V (for HDCD) digital sources that the lower voltage output via single RCA outputs will better avoid excessive attenuation that could lead to bit stripping, but will reduce the full clean power output potential.  With the typical 4V (for CD) - 4.4V (for HDCD) balanced XLR output you'll get greater noise rejection, full power output from your amp, but with the necessary volume attenuation required you'll increase the chances of bit stripping.

FYI, if I recall correctly the ML needs somewhat unique Camac connectors on the interconnects for RCA input.

Other considerations, most external DACs unlike many all-in-one players are incapable of playing SACDs natively. While there are now many affordable DACs that can equal or outperform units from the past, currently the cost of dedicated disc transports tends to be somewhat expensive. The best value might be in an all-in-one player that has digital inputs that can serve as a hub for additional digital sources such as a streamer.

The above is in reference to "ideals". One doesn't need to match everything exactly in order to achieve satisfactory results. There is some wiggle room, particularly when using the above-mentioned DACs with extra available bits. Such a system if carefully put together to be compatible can not only offer terrific value it can also offer perhaps the purest sounding one. Some, however prefer to add a bit of flavor to the mix. FWIW, IMHO those that want to add something to the mix might be better served with a high-quality equalizer. YMMV.