''Óriginal parts'', ''identity '' and ''retip'' conundrum
The ''identity enigma'' is easy to explain with ''ownership''. Not everyone is familiar with logic or philosophy but everyone owns something or other.
Ownership assume ''one to one relation'' between an person (legal
bodies included) and one object of ownership. Think of question how
you can prove to own some object. You can also think about question
how to prove to be owner of, say an part of your stolen car.
What the ''force'' of the expression ''original'' is , is an enigma.
However Americans are typical example of people who are very
fond of ''original parts'' and willing to pay huge amount of money
for the ''precious'' (grin). By the so called ''retips'' the assumption
is also ''original'' versus ''not original parts''. This means that
every manufacturer as well ''retiper'' uses his own styli and or
cantilevers. The fact however is that they all buy those ''parts''
by either by Namiki or Ogura. So, logicaly speaking, the origin
of those ''parts'' are either Namiki or Ogura. Is gluing an cantilever/
stylus combo in the ''joint pipe'' rocket science?
best-grove, English grammar does not specify the connective ''IS" between Subject and Predicate in an sentence But logic does: 1, Substitution of an object under one notion (nandric is human) 2. Inclusion relation between two classes or sets the smaller under bigger. Horses are 4 legs animals. Americans are part of the world population. 3, Identity relation : a=b; 2+2 = 4 4 exsitence (being) ''God is''
Which ''IS'' do you have in mind? |
''Meaning'' and ''reference''. One need to understand an sentence or statement to grasp its meaning. But the so called ''reality'' is not linguistic . That is why one also speaks about ''extra -linguistic reality''. The so called ''correspondence with reality'' is needed for an statement to be true, Well the assumptions or assertions about ''original parts'' are based on meaning but not on reality. The reality is that all styli and cantilevers are not produced by manufacturer but by, say, two Japanese Jewel companies. So all manufacturer as well retippers get those from the same source. The expression ''original'' may have ''emotive meaning'' but this meaning does not correspond with reality. Besides ''original parts'' presuppose identification which is not linguistic but ''realistic'' in the empirical sense. In this sense the expression ''original'' make no sense,
|
As the subject is to be focused on Styli, Cantilevers and Original, the proposal that a Styli and Cantilever assembly is a product from a limited number of Companies that are considered being a Supplier of the parts for a Manufacturers Supply Chain in the procurement of the overall items to be assembled, does seem to have a relevance in todays Manufacture for a Cartridge, even though it is known there are Cartridge Manufacture Companies and 'Retip' Services that as apart of a present Production or Refurbishment Service, offer a Bespoke Styli >Cantilever assembly that is not an assembly produced by the limited number of Companies that are being referred to. For the Original Element, the further back in time one will go to review the variations across the Cartridge Models that were offered in a Market Place, where a much larger range of options were to be encountered. There will be many descriptions supplied by the Manufacturer that will suggest that there is a Bespoke Part to be found in a particular Cartridge, and a part that was most likely produced by a specialist with access to the materials selected or even a in house assembly of the selected parts. Then there is the other consideration where a design is evolving and Parts are being included and deselected , either on paper or after thorough assessment through demonstrations and testing. Parts used at the design stages and deselected, would still warrant a status of a Original Part, but not the part selected for the model to be the, 'Piggy, that went to market'. Is it not possible that when a challenge is made by a owner of a quite old model of Cartridge, where there is a rejection of the idea of using a Third Party 'retip' Service, The challenge is due to the idea the 'retip' Service is going to use parts that are not related to the Cartridge Parts used in the era of production, and the most likely place to acquire these parts is with the original manufacturer, or at the least get a sympathetic service supplied from the Manufacturer that is considering the Cartridges age and uniqueness due to the Vintage. From experience of taking the time to read the terms of the Service offered by a Manufacturer for their refurbishment service, bear in mind I have not read all Manufacturer's terms, I will say once more the used word 'equivalent' is the get out of jail card. There is not going to be a Cartridge produced that is a match in parts used to the model being refurbished, there is going to be parts used for the refurbishment, that are assessed, hopefully by an adept technician to be an 'equivalent' part. There will be a function parity only. In a 'Nutshell' one more Bespoke Refurbishment is produced of a Cartridge. This Bespoke Refurbishment from a Manufacturer or from a 'retip' Service if both carried out by adept technicians will most likely have very closely match similarities as the modern supply chains are ubiquitous in their presence and do not seem to be an exclusive entity, hence the offered parts end up being available to numerous parties. @nandric good to see you back, with your learned descriptions and following mind boggle to boot.
|
