Unless there's no proof, it's only dogma.Czarivey: IÂm going to go way out on a limb here, and assume that English is not your first language, as I can think of no other explanation for your incomprehensible and incoherent comment (exemplified by the above sentence), unless, of course, it is due to the misuse or overuse of your favorite psychoactive substance, combined injudiciously with something more prosaic like, say, airplane glue.
As someone who makes his living from the fruits of the talented musicians who create the records you sell, one would think you would be a bit more sympathetic to their desire to not be ripped-off by the sale and circulation of unauthorized copies of their works.
Your posts make it pretty clear that you love music, so I find it difficult to comprehend the cloak of willful ignorance in which you wrap your outlandish opinions. Do you really think it is NOT illegal to make and distribute unauthorized copies of copyrighted material?
Why the RIAA? Because they claim to represent the artists who are harmed by illegal sharing of their works. Many of the positions and actions taken by the RIAA can be legitimately criticized, and I am rather surprised to find myself defending them, but in this matter I believe they are right.
If you think this is all merely Âdogma you might want to have a look at this page, which explains some of the basics: The Law
One notable highlight:
Burning a copy of a CD onto a CD-R, or transferring a copy onto your computer hard drive or your portable music player, wonÂt usually raise concerns so long as:You seem to relish the persona of the rebel and the outlaw, which is, of course, your prerogative. But donÂt pretend that your viewpoints are legitimate or worthy of emulation.
 The copy is made from an authorized original CD that you legitimately own
 The copy is just for your personal use. ItÂs not a personal use  in fact, itÂs illegal
 to give away the copy or lend it to others for copying.
IÂm done with this discussion: peace out!
-