Interesting Result of Comparison of Expensive and Budget Setups


My DAC has both RCA and XLR outputs. My 1 year old tube preamp has both RCA and XLR inputs. My 10+ years old budget 5.1 channel receiver has only RCA inputs. In a sudden, I had an idea to want to make two setups to compare the sound. 

Setup A (tube):

Tube amps (50 watts per channel) and preamp, a pair of top of the line 2-1/2 way tower horn speakers of this speaker series with the name brand audiophile series of XLR interconnect, power and speaker cables, total MSPR cost was way way over $10K in retail stores. All components are fairly new.

Setup B (solid state):

AV receiver (95 watts per channel) and a pair of midrange smaller 4-way tower cone speakers with stock or self-made RCA interconnect, power and speaker cables, total MSPR cost was $1K top.  All components are 10+ years old.

Source, volume, room treatment, and listening position were the same for both setups. I used mute function to turn on and off the sound simultaneously on both setups to try to hear the differences immediately. Here were the results:

1. Setup A was sounding slightly warmer. Bass was slightly less punchy as well.

2. Setup B was sounding noticeably brighter and a bit more dynamic. Bass was also a bit punchier.

3. Sound stage, vocal clarity and musical presence were about the same.

My thoughts:

1. Since there was no huge difference in sound quality between two setups, I recommend not to let the price tags drive your choice when you shop for your gears. 

2. High quality playback source is the key to have great music, not necessary the amps, the preamps or the cables.

I would like to hear your opinions. Welcome to share.

 

idolindian

True more expensive does not automatically equal better performance. Usually it does to a certain extent especially at high or very low volumes but law of diminishing returns starts to set in very quickly. 
 

I would say 2k would be my lower limit all in for a very good system. Used of course. Gotta watch them deals! 

4 ohm or less speakers will need a beefster amp to sound their best. Something more friendly I don’t think the difference is as large. Put a Revel or Dynaudio on a Denon receiver and you would likely get better sound out of a Best Buy speaker using the same receiver. 
 

If your willing to go 10 or so years old you can put together a 15k msrp system for 2k no problem. Just don’t be in a hurry. 

@idolindian 

 

what was the playback level (db) of your experiment? Sorry if you mentioned it I missed it. 

@mceljo 

Those Focals are sweet! Several months ago I traveled 6 hours round trip for some 836w s and they are amazing fun speakers. 

@mofojo My first true hi fi experience with with Vienna Accoustics speakers at a local shop and it sort of blew my mind.  When I was in the market the shop was exclusively Focal and I immediately fell in love with the sound from Grande Utopias down to the 706v bookshelf speakers (hooked to the big system).  I purchased the most expensive ones that I could justify and have never once had a negative thought about the purchase.

When I first purchased them I had an Onkyo receiver and the results was completely unsatisfactory which lead to the Integra 50.1 receiver that I still have on the home theater side of things.

There's no question in my mind that the best equipment I have ever heard costs more. It does more. It renders more subtlety, more tonal color, greater image size, more complex soundstage rendering, greater presence and slam, and both greater microdynamics AND macrodynamics.

 

You can get a few of these qualities in lower end systems, but, in general, the higher up you go, the more of these qualities are rendered.