Mogami 2921 Bi wire vs Canare 4S11 Bi wire Opinions


We all know the addiction to this hobby. Well I'm looking for opinions comparing these two speaker wires. What kind of a change do you think the Canares would bring? Your thoughts will be appreciated. I know that trying the Canares would be the best answer. 

My system:
NAD C 658 Preamp with HDMI module.
Parasound Halo JC5.
Audioquest NRG-Z2 Ac power cords for pre and amp.
Velodyne HGS 10 sub.
LG 65 inch TV.
Arcam DVD/CD.
Mogami XLR's By Jerry at 10 Audio. Replaced with Morrow Audio MA4's.
Audioquest Cinnamon 48 HDMI cables.
Audioquest Greyhound Sub cable.
Mogami speaker wire 2921.
Speakers are Bi-wired.
Sonus Faber Olympica III.

 

greywolf

Canare 4s11 is a good cable. But as everyone said it’s unlikely to be drastically different than Mogami. 
If you’re looking to build a nice pair of speaker cables give Neotech cable a try. 
Yes it’s more expensive but it will give a lot of bang for your buck.  

Thanks everyone.

I thought there would be little difference but wanted some opinions. My speaker wire has no terminations so I may try to put some on. I like locking Banana connectors. 

I do think the Morrow Audio IC's of solid core wire made a difference. Better in the midrange and bass.

 

 

In my system i preferred the canare (4s11,4s12) over mogami (3104)...had more verve/life to it...morrows a good pair of ic's.No connector is good thing.

I think the furez 124az is on par and maybe a little more on offering fwiw.