Neil Young calls out Tidal

CDC and FDA (can’t remember who exactly sets these rules) are set up so that if a prophylactic exists for a given condition..then..experimental ’treatments’ for the contentious conditions, cannot go forward, and the known prophylactic goes forward.

This meant that if ivermectin was found to be effective, no mRNA experimental treatments would ever have been allowed to reach the public of the united states and thus their ability to be used across the entire would would have likely been shuttered and shunned by most of the world’s nation-state governing bodies.

Pfizer, for one, would probably be $200 billion dollars poorer at this time. Never mind all the rest of it that remains unspoken.

For mRNA treatments (they are not vaccines) to be allowed to be used on the citizens of the USA, in their experimental and unapproved form, Ivermectin would have to never be useful to treat covid. No evidence of ivermectin efficacy could ever officially reach the CDC/FDA pairing, at all. Or any other drug/product, either.

Thus, ivermectin was forced to be sidelined. As were others.

There is considerable data and news stories and reporting to illustrate that there was something big going on with regard to blocking all efforts that were outside of the approval of the mRNA treatments for experimental use on people.

Isn’t that just so darned interesting. It makes one think.

FYI ....at the least, there are three ex-heads of CDC/FDA departments, that are now directly on the boards of the major pharmaceutical corporations involved in the proffered experimental mRNA treatments.

There are dozens more interesting points out there about this situation, that do not appear in the mainstream news ~at all~.

~~~~~~~~~

One of those points not found in the news:

IF...a mRNA treatment is finally given approval for use on humans, as an approved treatment, then the public of the united states can sue the given corporation that issued the mRNA treatment. The us public can sue the given pharmaceutical corporation for damages and injuries.

Pfizer mRNA product--- has been approved for use on humans.

But. A really big but.

Pfizer is ..apparently....still not issuing the approved mRNA treatment for humans, in the USA.

They are still issuing the experimental version, which they cannot be sued over the use of.

There exists a pathway for a pharmaceutical company to gain total immunity from being sued over the side effects or health effects of a given mRNA treatment.

That.... is when the given mRNA treatment (or actual vaccine or whatnot)is finally approved for use on ALL citizens of the USA, specially that of children, down to the level of being approved on newborns.

What do we see? We see the lack of issuance of the actual approved product which Pfizer could be sued over..., the quiet and continued distribution/use of the product that Pfizer can’t be sued over... and a tremendous push to gain approval for the use of the mRNA treatment on children and newborns.

The product is being made and used up all the time.

Pfizer could have issued and handed out approved and properly named/labelled vials of their approved product in almost minutes after approval, yet they have not done so.

There is no viable innocent looking reason for this situation of non-approved varieties still being the only ones in use and circulation, anywhere.

teo_audio

CDC and FDA (can’t remember who exactly sets these rules) are set up so that if a prophylactic exists for a given condition..then..experimental ’treatments’ for the contentious conditions, cannot go forward, and the known prophylactic goes forward

Yes stick on a "legal" or "formal" expression on a single point and cover the general criminal situation...

very good tactic... 😁😊

congratulation...

Thats a pure "fiction" also you probably think that a universal agressive campaign against all prophylatic and treatment was put in place world wide and in the US ?

That’s pure fiction.

I am a silly conspirationist for sure because i claim that this campaign is evident for all eyes....

All truckers protesting agaisnt fascist states of North America, which resemble more and more to China every day,  are idiots and you cleeds live in a "democracy" for sure... You own a gun and you are free i am sure...Biden or Trump were not dictators for sure nor Trudeau even if some of their actions is TOTALITARISM...They are not dictators you are right... The truckers know and me too that they are empty puppets..

But go on with blinders and point other debatable small points in teo post there is others, look for them, like a bird focussing on a worm oblivious of the predator over his head...

Look - the pharma companies are no angels, they are like any other - beholden to their shareholders. That does not subtract the good that they have done saving millions of lives, and hospitalizations with the vast majority being those over 65 or people with comorbidity (that may have not known it) including being overweight. That should have been an opportunity for some "get healthy" messaging, which for some reason hasn't happened. That's the point - you take the vaccine to prevent hospitalization or death, and if catching it having milder symptoms, and in most cases, not catching the disease at all. You don't know how you will react to the virus.

We have learned a lot since the onset, like how it is transmitted, yet people still are nuts with all the excessive hand sanitizing, which is generally not something that should be done constantly. You need some exposure to bacteria that can be helpful (I am no doctor, so correct me if I am wrong). Just because we have learned new things doesn't mean there was a conspiracy in the beginning (although I would think they would have know about different masks effectiveness). 

If Pfizer is trying to limit their legal liability, I would want that from a shareholder's standpoint, so long as public health is not compromised.

I saw an interview with Clapton, and he came off like a misinformed conspiracy theorist.

You don't have to get a vaccine in the US, but if you don't, it is possible you may lose some privileges (including in some cases employment). The US isn't like China or even some European countries in this regard. I don't see a downside to getting one. The rare side effects are widely publicized and are so rare that they are almost completely anecdotal, from what I can tell. It's always, I know a guy who's this person's boyfriend whose mother got sick from the shot. Also could have gotten sick from a number of other things including other conditions.

If something worked in India, it would be documented by their medical professionals and would surely have been leveraged globally. I haven't heard about that at all. Please share @mahgister , I would love to read about it from a TRUSTED MEDICAL SOURCE.

There is NO MIRACLE cure of Covid...

My point is that treatment at low cost is better than FORCED vaccinations of all people..

It takes few minutes to see the number of people infected proportionately in vaccinated Israel and in non vaccinated Uttar pradesh few months ago.....

Covid exist everywhere even in India... they use vaccination in India in some provinces and not so much in some other ...

The question is why vaccinate ALL people and not only those at risk with inefficient vaccinations anyway ?

Why not vaccinatting ONLY at risk people? and treat the others...

Even vaccinated you can transmit the virus and be ill...Ptobably less gravely ill if you are old with co morbidities... 

If you want a medical source look at Pierre Kory in the US and all the doctors behind him which are thousands...They are others use google...read about Peter McCullough...

The problem is not vaccinate or not...

The problem is MASS indiscriminate forced vaccinations in the US army and others corporations and commercial place at risk to loose your job...

No one with a sound mind is against vaccinations by principle...

The truckers in Canada protest not against the use of vaccines they protest against  totalitarian medecine by corporate interests...