So, you literally mean copper wire terminated to spade or banana plugs with the specs that you mentioned?
I guess it would be a good experiment, I will have to try that.
Thnx
Question about Bi-Wiring
My speakers, Martin Logan Motion 40's, are bi-wire capable.
But I have not tried to bi-wire them just yet.
I was wondering, if I were to get better jumper cables to replace the default metal plate jumpers that came with the speakers, would that accomplish the same results as actually bi-wiring the speakers
Or
Should I just go straight to actually bi-wiring?
Thanks
Sherlock:
Glad you asked. I knew you would ask that question. You folks always ask that question. The answer is YES. I always do A/Bs, and always double blind, with my neighbors as third party. As a matter of fact, I just did an ABX yesterday. I nailed it ten out of ten. I was trying to determine whether I can really distinguish between Luciano Pavarotti and Michael Jackson, or weather brain was playing tricks to me 🙄
|
Well @thyname Michael Jackson was wearing masks before it became fashionable. So there is something there. @pesky_wabbit yeah supply chain is probably it. Luckily I was able to use the lamp cord as the fat 4’ AQ cables that connect to the monoblocks, would not stretch out to a stereo amp that replaced the blown monoblock(s). The OP could also get some copper bar to replace the jumper on his speakers. Which should be easier to source with the supply chain dramas. The speakers still sound great with lamp cords, but I did bi-wire them as they seemed a bit skinny. At least the picture is a true depiction of how it sits at the moment. Maybe it sound good because the speakers are good… but the bass end of the spectrum has been a bit thin. |
@jay73 RE:
Exactly - here's the problem with those plates
I had a pair of bi-wire speakers
If you are into DIY tale a look at these cables - they provide excellent results My Audio Alchemy (image99.net) If you have any questions just ask Hope that helps - Steve |