Okay, let's get back to the fun.
Trannies are tinny!
Tubies are tubby!
Analog ain't awful, it's awesome!
Digital ain't dismal, it's delightful!
About users with hidden agendas
If you know that a user is a dealer and they fail to disclose and attacks other users because they make a point against their interest, do you expose the user?
I know of a gentleman here that continuously posts and goes after people and does not disclose who he is.
What are the ethics of this forum?
- ...
- 541 posts total
| Post removed |
@jerryg123 as you know being autistic is not easy. It is so shameful that this guy is so unkind, ignorant and callus that goes on attacking people in such pathetic way. For myself, being highly functioning autistic has proven, despite all the challenges, to be a gift. By learning how to manage my triggers, I learned how to navigate through difficult times, help others to understand that with compassion and kindness we can get through things that one would have never been possible. Sound is subjective until it intersects with science, and science is not subjective. It is at this intersection where some, like Ted, can’t discuss things without becoming offensive and degrading; maybe because their lack scientific understanding, manners, class or arrogance; or a combination of all of them. Very few showcased this so elegantly, specially in English, as Floyd Toole; with whom I had the opportunity to have a few deep technical discussions about sound reproduction when he was doing a research study in signal integrity about 18-20 years ago. |
Audio is mainly acoustic not the gear... Basically good gear will do... ( aiming at the best design there is in the world make no sense for most people anyway ) But nothing will replace acoustic...
i say the same thing than you but less economically: things begin to be interesting at this intersection between subjective and objective... Why ?
Because save for some people, learning is a PROCESS in time AROUND this intersection... My subjective ecaluation has changed each week for almost the last 2 years... I was learning how to put in place the conditions to increase the value of my subjective evaluation... Buying something and writing that this is good and this is my subjective ruling evaluation means not a lot... Only the objective process guiding us to our subjective evaluation means something FOR ALL... Selling a piece of gear, even a good one and saying thaty only subjective appreciation means something is preposterous...Audio reviews are indicative of a trend in bulk numbers but thats all.. Each separate subjective evaluation means almost nothing save if the reviewer guide us through an objective learning path to increase our own subjective perception...But most revewers sell gear... very few educate... It is acoustic 101 who was my guiding rule ... I bought nothing else than basic gear and my ratio S.Q. price is over the roof... Thanks to acoustic treatment and mechanical acoustic control and tuning of the Speakers/ room... And vibrations control could cost very low... And cleaning the electrical noise floor too... i dont understand that most people cannot figure this .... And go on buying costly upgrade or partial costly "tweak" solution...
|
- 541 posts total