McIntosh -- good for show, not for sound, says dealer

While shopping for a new preamp, I saw an interesting you tube discussion from two employees in a canadian audio shop I believe. Both were well versed in the PS Audio and Mc Intosh lines and were comparing a $9,000 Mc Intosh (forgot model #) vs. the $6,600 PS Audio BHK. They both thought the PS Audio was more musical and that 30 minute video was what put me over the top to buy the BHK. Coming in Thursday.

The brand image is still going strong, a buddy of mine either has his ears full of wax or is brainwashed deep down to his subconsciousness. He believes it's still super high end.

Oldhwy...your rude comments are uncalled for, yet again...

Jerryg123 ,

I agree. 
 
 McIntosh reminds me of W. C. Fields…”they’re nice to look at, but I wouldn’t want to haaaaavvve one…”
 

Like anything blanket statements like "good for looks, not for SQ" gloss over tens of thousands of counter examples. 

My case: I run an old McIntosh power amp (MC-2300) and I love it. It's perfect for my needs (driving old, power hungry speakers) and I think it sounds wonderful.

About eight years ago I picked up one of those C-22 commemorative preamps (came out in 1995 I think) and didn't really like it and sold it.

So I end up thinking they're a good brand but caveat emptor. You have to do your due diligence and listen.