2. misc-audio
  3. 174969-107

Audio nonsense

In this wonderful world of audio that we journey through folks selling stuff have sometimes been inventive in what they claim. In your trip down this road what sticks out as the most ludicrous thing you’ve seen someone try to sell? 
 

I can point to 2 things. When I first saw a Tice clock in a store I thought it was a gag. Next- Peter Belt. 

zavato
tomic601's avatar
tomic601
13,185 posts
 

Every form of refuge has it’s price…or so The Eagles sang… I spend some time other forums..good advice to do same….

 

tomic601's avatar
tomic601
13,185 posts
 

..but let me know when one of you can show why US Patent office should revoke the DBS Patent Bill Low ( Audioquest ) and Richard Vandersteen ( Vandersteen Audio ) share…. a hint is Dialectric Bias….

;-)

Jim

pesky_wabbit's avatar
pesky_wabbit
1,183 posts
 

is this a done deal - patent revoked ? If so, could it be that the dielectric in question was incapable of holding a static charge of the voltage applied by the supplied battery? Or did Monster finally get their legal argument upheld?

dill
2,579 posts
 

No.

AudioQuest

tomic601's avatar
tomic601
13,185 posts
 

72 v, 128 if ya have a ….wait for it….Vandersteen power amp…..

 

More to discover