2. misc-audio
  3. 175682-1635

Amir and Blind Testing

Let me start by saying I like watching Amir from ASR, so please let’s not get harsh or the thread will be deleted. Many times, Amir has noted that when we’re inserting a new component in our system, our brains go into (to paraphrase) “analytical mode” and we start hearing imaginary improvements. He has reiterated this many times, saying that when he switched to an expensive cable he heard improvements, but when he switched back to the cheap one, he also heard improvements because the brain switches from “music enjoyment mode” to “analytical mode.” Following this logic, which I agree with, wouldn’t blind testing, or any A/B testing be compromised because our brains are always in analytical mode and therefore feeding us inaccurate data? Seems to me you need to relax for a few hours at least and listen to a variety of music before your brain can accurately assess whether something is an actual improvement.  Perhaps A/B testing is a strawman argument, because the human brain is not a spectrum analyzer.  We are too affected by our biases to come up with any valid data.  Maybe. 

chayro
tomic601's avatar
tomic601
13,078 posts
 

Y’all should build one of Nelson Pass variable distortion aka negative feedback machines, to better understand your own ear / brain preferences for……distortion…

Or a Music Reference ( Roger Modjeski genius RIP ) w 3 levels of negative feedback, careful level matching and you can hear for yourself what more negative feedback ( TIM ) does to image depth… See Opus 3 disc on image depth.

IF ya can’t tell i am in the Measure AND Listen camp, the interesting overlap a wise poster above mentioned….. 

Carry on…Best to all in music

Jim

Ag insider logo xs@2x
cleeds
6,033 posts
 
laoman

For someone to say you do not need to listen to a piece of equipment before buying it and also that the synergy of various components makes no difference is so funny.

Egg-zactly. But some people will buy a car without driving it first. Or they’ll buy a suit without having it properly tailored. It makes no sense.

larsman's avatar
larsman
2,085 posts
 

@phantom_av - Nobody is 'forced' to do anything. I see negative reviews of gear on YouTube reviews all the time. What will make people stop paying any attention to reviewers is if they always say everything is great - people buy something a reviewer says he loves and the buyer doesn't like it, that buyer will quit paying attention to that reviewer....

djones51
4,947 posts
 

and this includes the best tool of all, our ears. IOW, some use their ears better than others. Some, because of experience, training, open-mindedness, or simply physiological advantage hear better than others. Hard pill to swallow for some, but true.

Some use their ears and eyes not just their ears which means it's simply a subjective opinion that applies only to the one making the claim with the problem of bias not accounted for. It contributes nothing to gaining knowledge about a product. Hard pill to swallow for some, but true. 

djones51
4,947 posts
 

I don't know where this notion of ears being a great tool, they're  "tools" cobbled together by millions of years of evolution they're simply good enough for us to survive. There are tools that hear way beyond human ears just as there are tools that see way beyond the human eye. 

More to discover