My ears are my best measurement.
The point was that they are not a measurement. It is called a subjective experience.
The questions was:
I don’t understand, with the descriptors often used for cables, how we don’t have clear measurements showing the “dramatic changes” users report hearing. I’m not suggesting testing the cable, but rather, testing the sound of cable 1 from the LP, and then contrasting that with the sound of cable 2 measured from the identical location? It’s easy to eliminate the duplicate sounds from both leaving just what has changed. The tighter bass, or the better/ different midrange, or airier highs, etc, should easily come through, right?
So, why hasn’t that been done? Why has no cable manufacture shown this? For that matter, what proper test is there, video, showing people clearly able to identify cable 1 from 2? Especially considering there is “such a drastic difference?” Especially considering one cable can cost 10 bucks vs. 4K and more?
…
Don’t try to equate flowery words, trustworthy ears, marketing jargon with people wanting to understand if something is happening, and then what it is.
The opening sentance started out with “I don’t understand …”, so I guess your point was that the person cannot understand with having the golden ears?