Audio Research REF 80S Reviews/Comparisons


Would love to hear some opinions regarding the new REF 80S and how it compares to their previous generations of amps.  Here is my ARC amp story.

Classic 120 mono blocks - Played much stronger and more dynamic than their modest 110 wpc rating.  I found them very musical and enjoyed immensely for about 2-3 years.

REF 150 (nonSE) - This was an upgrade in all aspects.  I only sold due to the next entry

GSi75 - This was a diversion I made last year as simplification gained priority in my mind and I loved the aesthetics of this masterpiece being center stage on my shelf.  I still believe it is a phenomenal integrated for someone that has efficient speakers, which I do not(89db).

REF 75SE - This amp is far superior compared to the GSi75.  I find its power more comparable to the REF 150.  I wish I had them to A-B.  I was happy with the REF 150 and I am happy with this.  

I am in no hurry to get a REF 80S...maybe in a few years when it is replaced with an SE model and the price comes down on the S.  
dhite71

The best things for me is that 80s have RCA input besides with XLR. They finally realize that both kinds of input will be more welcomed than that before with XLR only.

 

I am a true believer in true balanced. The Ref 6 was optimized for running balanced and even though some may disagree, running true balanced is not only about hum rejection. Since my Ref 150 SE blew, I have been using my Ampsandsound Nautilus which offers both fake-balanced (transformer coupled since on SET amp can not by definition be balanced) and SE inputs. I have tried both. Even with the transformer coupled "balanced" inputs, running XLR's rather than RCA's sounds much better. My XLR's are Cardas Clear Beyond. My RCA'S are Analysis Plus Silver Apex. No doubt "it all depends" but with the Ref 6 the scary-real soundstage depth, height, and width collapses with RCA's. Bass tonality suffers too. 

As another example, I have a Luxman 750u headphone amp. It needed a minor repair (internal fuse). The tech who repaired if for me, Steven Leckrone, emphasized to me that the Luxman circuitry on his test bench made it clear to him that running balanced from input to output (the headphones) was essential for best sound. 

@fsonicsmith I agree. If you are talking the same pre, I will choose XLR output too.

But if the pre has only RCA output, and I love that sound,then there is no choice.

We must ask the power amplifier with RCA input.

Conrad Johnson , VTSP 360 and Rega pre ,and Luxman Cl38uc ,they are all very good,but go down with RCA only.

I listen to many pres and till now,I  stay with the pre with RCA only.

At end of day, What kind of house sound let you make the decision.

 

 

@fsonicsmith - sorry if I blinked and missed something, .... but what happened to your Ref 150SE?  Did you get the Ref 80S yet?  If so, did you get a chance to compare the 150SE to the 80S?

 

I took the same journey.  My Ref 150SE needed an expensive repair (start-up circuit needed a thermister and solenoid switch).  I decided to go the Ref 80S route as noted above.  My 80S is pretty much broken in now and sounds terrific.  I don't have a good sonic memory, but I think it sounds incrementally better than the 150SE.  As noted by me and others, I like the circuit enhancements, especially the fuses on the KT-150s.  I suffered through blown bias resisters in the past and it is no fun to soldier in new ones.

I look forward to hearing your reactions.

 

BIF

        

@bifwynne 

My 80S is due to arrive today. My Ref 150 SE remains all boxed up and taking up space in our foyer waiting for word from ARC as to an RMA. I am constantly tempted to simply take it to my local tech. ARC not willing to provide a schematic is one hurdle and the high cost of KT150's is another.