Frank Kuzma is releasing a new arm!

Aesthetics are important for some. Me included. To me it looks like an Orca whale (fitting giving it’s mass) and I would not want it if it were free. My Reed 3P’s not only sound great but to my eyes are beautiful. Same with my decks. I want both performance and beauty. If an Edsel could outrun a Lambo, would you want to be caught dead in it?

I'm into aesthetics as well and think this arm on a Kuzma Stabi R in black would look awesome. Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. 

@lewm , no, you can't entirely divorce inertia from mass but it does matter where the mass is. 

@fsonicsmith , stiffness of the arm tube is a very important characteristic for a tonearm and many of the best arms use wider diameter arm tubes. Certainly, the days of arms like the Infinity Black Widow are over. It does seem to me that if you are using a very stiff substance like sapphire you should be able to get away with a thinner lighter arm tube but there may be a problem manufacturing a smaller tapered sapphire tube. Frank Kuzma is no dummy. If he could have made it lighter he would have. He obviously had to compromise by making the arm a bit shorter. I think it is a good looking arm for what it is worth. Does it offer any advantages over arms like the regular 4 points or the Reed 2G, Schroder CB and Tri Planar? Set up correctly I would probably not be able to tell the difference and I would have to notice a difference to spend that kind of money. But, nobody has made a sapphire tonearm before so, this is another Kuzma first.

Frank Kuzma is no dummy, I totally agree.  I greatly admire his turntables, and based on the kudos accorded to them, I also admire his tonearms, until now, possibly. But sometimes even smart guys over reach.  We shall see. You wrote,  "no, you can't entirely divorce inertia from mass but it does matter where the mass is."  But in fact the equation for "effective mass" (not mass alone) already takes into account the distribution of mass in a tonearm, as I am sure you realize. Ergo "effective mass" is closely related to inertia. Perhaps Kuzma ameliorates the problem by using a variable damper counterweight, a la the Technics EPA100.

I also was wondering before this discussion ever came up, after having read Fremer's reveal of the sapphire tonearm, is sapphire really so much stiffer than other stiff but not so dense materials of which tonearms are conventionally made? For example, the Technics EPA100 arm wand, titanium nitride. And the Mk2 version which was made of boron something. Or even steel?

Here is what I found about the stiffness of Sapphire, albeit on a website for a company that sells things made of sapphire for industrial use:

"Sapphire is one of the hardest materials on earth. Mechanical hardness is typically measured using the Mohs scale: glass generally has a Mohs score between 6 and 7, and hardened steel which comes in at 8 Mohs. Sapphire has a Mohs hardness value of 9, placing it just below diamond which has a hardness of 10 Mohs.

Furthermore, sapphire is very stiff. Its Young’s modulus is 435 GPa, making it 6 times stiffer than quartz, so it can’t be stretched or deformed easily.

These properties make sapphire one of the strongest and most durable materials on the planet."