hana sl or one of the AT-ART9?

i am thinking now about an additional candidate.
the lyra delos, that i read good opinions about.
i know ,it’s more expansive, but if i will convinced that its better than the art 9, i am willing to starch my budget

sorry for confusing you and my self.
i read this:
"A tonearm whose effective mass is rated at 10 grams or below is considered low mass".
"A phono cartridge whose compliance is rated at 12 x l0ˉ6 or below, is considered low compliance".
"Low mass arms mate well with both moderately high and very high compliance phono cartridges."

my ton arm ( well tempered) is 10grams.
checked the compliance of the AT-ART9XA
 

for ART 9 XI

, static or  dynamic, and hoe it will effect the sound.
for lyra delos:

• Compliance: Approx. 12 x 10-6cm/dyne at 100Hz

I really like the Lyra cartridges, but the Delos that I tried is IMO a weak model in the line-up, especially when compared to other competitors in the same price range. The old AT ART-9 outperformed it in my setup when I had it for home trial.

On a low/medium mass arm like yours, I would prefer a Phasemation PP500 if you have the budget or a PP200 which is much lower in terms of price but I heard great things from people I trust. Another option would be the Dynavector XX2. I really disliked the entry level Dynavectors (10X5 and 20X2L), but the models above are really great value for money I feel, especially the XX2 and the XVI for which I'm saving money :)

Haven't heard the new AT ART-9, but if it was improved versus the old version, it should be a great cartridge and a serious contender to the above options. 

I friend uses an ART 9 and also has the top Hana and to be honest in his system VPI Prime21 the Art 9 is better over all. Over all the Hana was great just didn't dig as deep into the music or detail level in his system as the ART 9. 

AT have from what i read updated the ART series and there is a replacement for the ART9's now. 

anyway