SQ or performance?


In classical music, how much does the sound quality influence your enjoyment of a particular piece?  I find it plays a large part. A recording is an artifact in itself.  There are many factors which contribute to the final product. And even a great performance can be sabotaged by poor engineering, poor pressing, poor microphone placement and the like. Conversely, a mediocre performance can be attractive to us because of sterling acoustics.   
In “historical” recordings we may allow for bad sound, but in contemporary performances the sound can have  a significant bearing on our perspective.
Also, our appreciation of a given performance can be affected by other factors.  For example, if we grew up loving a certain version, all others may suffer by comparison in our view.
 

 

128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xrvpiano

Perhaps i am not an audiophile after all.... Performance over S.Q. all time if the performer is a god or an angel....Or a demonic entity...

😁😊

 

And perhaps the greatest sitar player with  Ravi Shankar ...

I dont give a damn about a  sound who is not extraordinary but just listenable...

 

This man is recorded by hidden microphone, he is a mystic who never give any concerts...He play ONLY in prayers with few people....

He is one of the greatest musical experience in the life of Yehudi Menuhin...And in mine...

Do you think Menuhin will trash this "awful recording" played by a sufi archangel?

 

Sound is not perfect here either...

Who give a damn about sound when we listen to one of the more innovative jazz  guitar player..