lewn,
True, even with perfect zenith alignment, only at the null point would the contact area of the cartridge along the line of tangency. But, the maximum error at other points will still be relatively small, whereas, zenith error in manufacturer is much higher, typically, according to the Wallytools people, plus or minus five degrees. Still, I am not inclined to open that can of worms with my setup.
mijostyn,
The dramatic difference in the inertial mass of air-bearing arms in the horizontal and vertical planes may be a problem or it may be a benefit. There are some arms, like the Morch Anisotropic arm, that deliberately increases the horizontal mass by using outrigger weights on the vertical axis (to reduce impact on vertical mass) so that the arm resists swinging side to side when large horizontal groove movements (i.e., monophonic bass waves) are presented. This preserves such bass information (a lot of deep bass is recorded monophonically (side to side movement) in order to reduce big changes in depth of the groove that stereophonic recording would entail), I've heard that arm and it DOES have impressive bass response. Likewise, I've heard impressive bass response from air-bearing arms, like the ET-2, and the high horizontal effective mass might be the reason. But, I do worry about whether such arms put a lot of strain on the cantilever when it has to drag the whole setup across the record--not only is the mass high, the lack of mechanical advantage of a pivot means a lot of force is needed to drag that arm linearly. This high sideways resistance to movement also makes we wonder if that means the cantilever is never tangent to the groove. Still, I've heard nice sound from all types of arms, so I don't know if any are inherently superior.