2. misc-audio
  3. 176850-3764

I don't want to beat a dead horse but I'm bugged.

I just can't clear my head of this. I don't want to start a measurements vs listening war and I'd appreciate it if you guys don't, but I bought a Rogue Sphinx V3 as some of you may remember and have been enjoying it quite a bit. So, I head over to AVS and read Amir's review and he just rips it apart. But that's OK, measurements are measurements, that is not what bugs me. I learned in the early 70s that distortion numbers, etc, may not be that important to me. Then I read that he didn't even bother listening to the darn thing. That is what really bugs me. If something measures so poorly, wouldn't you want to correlate the measurements with what you hear? Do people still buy gear on measurements alone? I learned that can be a big mistake. I just don't get it, never have. Can anybody provide some insight to why some people are stuck on audio measurements? Help me package that so I can at least understand what they are thinking without dismissing them completely as a bunch of mislead sheep. 

128x128russ69
charles1dad's avatar
charles1dad
10,250 posts
 

Superior sound is subjective. What you like someone else may hate. Many roads to the same place.

Agreed and exactly my point. You have to hear and listen to make a final choice determination. If some folks prefer to downplay actual listening,  more power to you and enjoy your scrutiny of numbers. Listening has served me well so I'll stick with that.  

Charles 

onhwy61's avatar
onhwy61
5,256 posts
 

The fact that one component can measure better than another isn't the point of my earlier comment.  I believe audiophiles should not have to accept poorly measuring equipment.  The tube equipment that I see measured in Stereophile actually measure fairly well.  As a group they don't measure as well as the majority of solid state amps, but it's not as if they don't have good measurements.

deludedaudiophile
493 posts
 

@onhwy61 

 

I think the implication is that some people like the sound of audible artifacts. I think I may have in the past. If you make them measure well you lose the artifacts.

charles1dad's avatar
charles1dad
10,250 posts
 

I think the implication is that some people like the sound of audible artifacts. I think I may have in the past. If you make them measure well you lose the artifacts.

Oy vey!

I guess I’m just not picking up the logic here. Oh well, nonetheless I do appreciate and respect everyone’s point of view on this topic.

Charles

pingstonsmile
43 posts
 

I have to say this. No one is going to beat a dead horse. I just cleaned up after two and if that is an indication of what is inside, YOU AIN'T gonna beat any dead horse.

WOW, what has my wife been feeding them. Holy$hit! I think the oats fermented to long. The pig farm is not helping...

More to discover