Balanced versus single ended


From my experience, every situation that had both options, the balanced connection and/or increased gain sounded better, regardless of the bolume knob’s final position. More detail , air, emotional connection etc. The single ended cables used were good, not the bargain or so called high end extreme.

Sometimes using balanced or xlr it involved just the source, but optimally it carried through thd entire chain.

Anyways, my question is: has anyone ever thought that single ended sounded better?given the 2 options. Im only referring to a truly balanced connection.

I ask, because a manufacturer who makes tube amps, recommends single over balanced connection. Is there something else involved in this decision, additional parts or labor complexity? Is the signal path extended?

Thanks in advance

 

recluse

@ghdprentice  When I said the sound is bigger when using XLR,I do not mean the volumne, I mean the sound has bigger 3d space,more  spacious.

      Do you love the spacious sound? I depend on the space you are listening.

More spacious more good for big space ,no good for small room.

        

A fully compliant AES 48 installation with good cables will always measure better than a non-balanced RCA installation. Regardless of line-length, noise rejection and other cable artefacts and earth separation will be better. In theory, it should sound better - in my experience it does.

I agree!

Mike

Good read see below:

https://www.ranecommercial.com/kb_article.php?article=2107

 

 

@runwell 

 

Thanks for the clarification. I guess this is where it comes down to what equipment you own. Mine does not sound bigger. 

My amp (Arcam) has both XLR and Phono inputs. Preamp has only has phono.

I will use 18in interconnects.

Phono to XLR cables are available. Is there any value to using these vs phono to phono?

Will most likely buy Worlds Best Mogami cables.