@lordmelton, please relax.
I'm not sure where you're getting your information, but it is quite incorrect.
Musetec (LKS) MH-DA005 DAC
Post removed |
@debjit_g re: ... "On a serious note, you can never win a battle over there and neither they can win a battle over here. It’s a never ending story that started ever since the dawn of the day and will continue till apocalypse ☠️ I agree completely. If I may, I suggest that everyone relax - and perhaps hold off on the name calling. |
Btw, also I didn't state that the DA005 doesn't meet standards, or that ASR doesn't like the measured results (which is definitely true :-). What I pointed out was IF (and I emphasized the IF) the measured performance is correct, then it doesn't meet the specs claimed by the manufacturer. That seems like a reasonable observation to me. No? |
Any old competent engineer can design a DAC that tests well. For example, as one user has written elsewhere, "the majority of the distortions comes from the discrete I/U and output stage. The output amplifier and buffer has no feedback (I think). Without it the distortion values cannot compete against integrated op amps." I would not have him change my own DAC to meet the need for a better specification. I wonder what the audiophile public will make of a product that is designed only by listening without reference to tecnical specs, and that does not publish technical specifications. One thing it may do is to define better the term "audiophile." I did advise him that when you publish technical specifications you invite tests that should confirm those specifications. So perhaps he should revise that part of his site. @sns |