My wife has a better hearing than me and she cannot tune my room because she has never train herself in acoustic experiments......
You seems to separate brain and ears...
Acoustic is a physical science, psycho-acoustic is not...
I seems most of you can’t "comprehend" the fact that everything a human can hear can be measured.
Do you read what is posted here?
Human Time-Frequency Acuity Beats the Fourier Uncertainty Principle
Jacob N. Oppenheim and Marcelo O. Magnasco
Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 044301 – Published 23 January 2013
This was discovered few years ago in experiments in psycho-acoustic...
If you were right about what you just claim, we know all there is to know about human hearing by ELECTRICAL measures apparatus , this article would have been characterized useless. and never published..
Your claim is dogma.... scientism... Not science...
In psycho-acoustic the concept of timbre is impossible to define rigorously without correlating in a dynamic set of measuring process, electrical measures, physical acoustic conditions, and human perceptive experience...
Many concept and experience are inseparably subjective and objective correlative process...
Hearing +interpretation by learning history and training, is not reducible to few electrical information gained from measuring tools, nor completely predictable...
A musician is not a trained dog...a good acoustician too...
To make my point simple for your understanding: hearing =ears...listening= brain history... The two are correlated but listening cannot be reduced to only hearing acuity...It is more complex...
And the article above prove by experiments that listening skill can beat what physical science said was the ears limit before 2013...
It is why i can tune any room, my wife with a better hearing status cannot...
It is called positive learned biases....
