Yeah I was talking to you… It looked like you have skin in the game?
And I was thinking it took “a big set” to defend those speakers.
Secondly I am not sure it is prudent to classify @noske of idolatry?
But are you talking about idolatry of ASR, or that of Toole/Olive and countless other researchers?
Defending a speaker that was deemed bad by ASR and good by others could make sense.
Do some here believe that the GR LGK is a good speaker?
One person posted a 1/2 hour video review of some other speaker, I suppose as proof that the GR was good, however it looked like it was not even the LGK model.
I can appreciate that people do not like AM’s message, or maybe his message delivery… but it seems like it is totally divisive to discount the whole research arm as something to be removed.
In this one on one, I think that I would have to side with AM over GR. That video clip did sound very distorted on play back, and if I was on a desk using them I would want to be able to hit 90dB being only ~1 meter away.