I owned a 9.0 for a number of years and tried many tubes. If you have a tube rectified power supply I would upgrade with a gz34 metal base. It made the biggest improvement to any component I've ever owned.
- ...
- 65 posts total
@testrun This thread is about the PH9.0, which typically doesn't have a tube rectified power supply. That said, the older SWP 9.0 did and rolling that tube led to substantial upgrades! Did you have a PH9.0 with a tube rectified power supply? I asked Dan about that years ago and he mentioned the SS and tube versions were not interchangable. |
@blisshifi Good Info about the 6C45. I thought the Sovtek was the only one. Thanks! |
I have been fortunate to have been demonstrated in the UK a Modwright PH 9.0 'SE' and not the 'X' Model. This attached is the sale add for the Phonostage I was demonstrated. _____________________________________________________________ Modwright Instruments SWP 9.0se Phono stage for Sale _____________________________________________________________ There has been a few years past now, but do recall it had a very warm sonic, that was very relaxing and I felt perfect for adding a colour to Chicago Blues Recordings. I am not aware if the 'X' Model is with the same sonic traits. If there is a Bloom with the 'X' model, and a it is wanted to be heard with a leaner sonic trait. My experience of the Amperex Bugle Boy's - 'Orange Text' has shown these are quite un-valve like when compared alongside a range of valves. What is good to know is that there are tube options to produce a Warm Bloated Sound, and the Antithesis of this being quite lean. I use Early 60's E88CC's in two devices. The choices made following quite a few periods of Tube Rolling, are Siemens and Halske in a Phonostage and Mullards in a DAC. Is it not strange that different Valves are selected from each other for different circuits? Tube Rolling does deliver a few curve balls.
|
- 65 posts total