There are three CAL DACs in our house right now. A beloved Alpha (non-24/96)in the bedroom system; a Sigma II (non-24/96) in the TV room, doing great things hanging off a DVD player; and a 24/96 Sigma II that is in a cupboard gathering dust. The regular Sigma II sounds more musical to these ears, regardless of which system I A-B them in--fuller, warmer. I don't know if this experience is mirrored in the Alpha realm because I've never heard a 24/96 Alpha, but I can say that the Alpha is very tube sensitive (more so than the Sigma II) and you can get a lot out of it, as others have observed here, by putting in favorable tubes. Telefunken 12ax7s and Mullards CV2004's didn't do it for me--too flabby--and they had me wondering if I had made a mistake in buying the darned thing. Thankfully, I get experimenting. I agree that the Sylvania 5751 blackplates make this unit sing. Raytheon 5751 blackplates are really good in it too, and can be found for less $.
CAL Alpha DAC: Stock vs. 24/96 upgrade
I recently purchased a used stock (I believe 18-bit) CAL Alpha Tube DAC. I'm considering the 24/96 upgrade. Those of you who are familiar with the sound of both, please weigh in. Also, tubes that you like with either version, what sound do they produce? My DAC came with the Eico/Mullard brand 12AX7/ECC83. Thank you in advance.
- ...
- 27 posts total
- 27 posts total