I don’t believe anyone has a problem with someone trying to sell a product, especially a high value product that in your estimation also performs at a high level. That’s cool.
I can see why some have a problem that the person/organization doing so doesn’t have to be shady and use the name of another company who has worked hard, invested and built their brand. Its a very low character thing to do to sell your product, riding the coat tails of someone else’s work. In parts of the world, this practice is common place, which is unfortunate.
The way you describe it, its no big deal. I happen to agree with you that pride of ownership is a personal thing. My challenge with the whole exercise is they are using someone else’s name to profit from. They didnt have to do that. I know you must have a line where this practice is horrible right? @juanmanuelfangioii is rightly bothered by this practice because fake aviation parts put people’s lives at risk. Fake baby formula kills children. Fake pharma can as well. By purchasing “insignificant” fake items you see no harm but the practice emboldens “fakers” to follow the money and begin counterfeiting those things that can endanger lives. I get it, people are just trying to make a buck and those purchasing are just trying to save a buck. The slippery slope is a result of those that partake in either side of a transaction like this.