@dhcod , that is all fluffy subjective garbage.
What I am trying to impress people like dhcod with is this is not subjective, it's what I like to hear stuff. That is an excuse to validate inferior equipment. There is accurate reproduction and there is everything else. There in only one accurate. Any deviation from accurate is inaccurate. People think that because accuracy is hidden from everyone that they can make up any definition of what accurate is, a definition that is of their liking. Sorry, doesn't work for me. Accuracy can be found but it takes a kind of persistence most of us do not have. Nor do they really want to. They have more important things to do.