@sevestan Nah, Alex Jones has no clue. However, Giorgio A. Tsoukalos is the one who is always in the know. ;)
Serious Question About Silver vs Copper Conductivity for Power
Yes, I realize that this topic is going to bring out the sharks, but if I get at least one serious response, it will all be worth it.
I understand that silver conducts 7% faster than copper. I also understand that using a dielectric insulation like Teflon is best at keeping the wire from overheating, stopping signals entering and stopping signals from leaving the conductor. I understand that a certain amount of math is involved in selected gauge of wire depending largely on how much power the component is going to take, and how much the amperage is (20 or 15).
My question is regarding certain features applied to either silver or copper conductors that may or may not have an advantage over one or the other.
I have the Kimber Kable P14 Palladian. This uses 14awg copper conductors insulated in Teflon. Then it adds a massive filter that attempts to mitigate the standing wave ratio to as close to 1:1 as possible. I had Kimber’s Ascent power cable prior. It’s identical to the Palladian, except the filter. I have heard the difference between using those two cables. Apparently, mitigating the standing wave ratio lowers the noise floor significantly. However, any filter that chokes the signal and will slow the electrical current.
As I understand it, the amplifier works by opening the rectifier to allow the capacitors to fill with energy that the system will draw from. Being able to keep the rectifier open and fill the capacitors as fast as possible, reducing lag time, has the effect of creating more realistic and detailed sound.
With that said, changing to a power cable that uses pure silver insulated in Teflon, will ensure that power is delivered potentially faster. Although, the silver power cable will NOT have a filter. Therefore the standing wave ratio will not be mitigated and the electrical signal will not be choked either.
So, would the amplifier benefit from faster electrical current or slower, but cleaner electric current? Since this signal isn’t directly applied to sound, the concepts of “colder” or “warmer” sound should not apply.
Can someone help me out without poking fun at the question? Additionally, I am not interested in having a cable-theory debate. If you don’t believe cables make any difference, I will not debate or have discourse on that topic.
- ...
- 152 posts total
But people do care about this stuff and like to understand it, and to share their knowledge.
Actually a metal does have control of its atomic structure, which is why metals are conductive, and do not have a massive gap that they need to overcome in order to get an electron “free”.
The electrons for copper and the ones for Silver are the same sub atomic particulars. So all the electronics in the box have no way of differentiating where any particular electron came from. And ^that^ assumes that it is all about electrons in a EE sense. If it is actually about electric fields, then the electronics may also care about things like dielectrics, which are not conductive.
It is not a resistance coil. The things which are designed to have inductance are called inductors.
No, that is incorrect.
No, This is also incorrect. Inductance is not resistance, and neither is capacitance call resistance. Resistance is the “real part” of impedance, and the complex part of impedance is governed by inductance and capacitance. One can have a massive inductor, with a lot of inductance, and it can also have a DC resistance close to zero. The metal has no effect on capacitance, nor on inductance.
Places sell the wire woven, and some people do simple twists on smaller wires/cables. Kimber 12TC is one example of a bare woven wire. And there is another out of Tx, which I forget the name of. https://kimber.com/products/12TC
It is not rocket science. |
@holmz |
@twoleftears |
- 152 posts total