I really wish that people would be specific in these posts. If you've listened to the Pharaoh 1 but not the 2, then you have no right to comment. There's a world of difference between the original and the improved versions of the Pharaoh. I've heard both versions. I've also owned the Sphinx 1, the Sphinx 2, the Cronus Magnum 2, and now the Pharaoh 2. The Pharaoh 2 definitely has bass punch, no argument. But with the proper tube rolling and speakers, I do not want to hear that the midrange is lacking. I have Sonus faber Sonetto 5's, and I have gained midrange with the Pharaoh. I would probably avoid ribbon tweeters and metal tweeters with the Pharaoh as well. I absolutely loved my CM 2, but I have no regrets in moving up to the Pharaoh 2. Glad you're asking questions, but try if you can, to listen and judge for yourself. Realize that the advice you're getting here is worth every penny you're paying for!
- ...
- 43 posts total
@lradder completely agree. I have the Pharaoh II as well as a number of other integrated amps. It is a very nice integrated and it comes in second to my AH Qualiton X200 that is also double the price and then some. Find the mids are better with the X200. |
@lradder , Will you elaborate as to your opinion to avoid ribbon tweeters with the Pharaoh 2? |
- 43 posts total