How does one weigh the virtues an older amp vs. a younger one?


When does new tech beat old, even at a lower original price point? For example, I’m looking at a Pass INT_150 (about 2010, at MSVP $7150) and a Simaudio Moon 340i (mid 2010s and $4950). Leave aside the age factor of the amplifier itself for the time being, and assume an A/B listening comparison is not practical. Excuse me if I’m being crass about this. My apologies to Pass and Simaudio!

Ag insider logo xs@2xrichardmathes

My experience has been that for a given level of amp, 10 years and new is substantially better than the older. Not just noticeable, but wow, that is really better. I have been at this 50 years and owned multiple generations of Pass amps from the Threshold s500 back in 1980.

A couple years ago moved over to Audio Research tubed amps. I will not be going back.

Think of an old car with few miles vs a lot of miles. No comparison. Amps are similar, if you can get an old amp that wasn’t used a lot vs was played hard, it makes a difference. I like my Carver 505 that was built in the nineties a lot and I would put it up against any of todays amps up to $1500.

 

OP, since you are talking integrated amps, how about a Mark Levinson No. 383.  George Meyer in Los Angeles, who is an authorized Mark Levinson repair facility has completely refurbished units at $3,000 dollars and another for $3,200 dollars.  These are outstanding integrated amps.  Here is the info:

Mark Levinson No. 383 integrated amplifier

Mark Levinson No. 383 integrated amplifier